Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-092 . . .~ ~ . ,DEXEO :::91- 18266 BK 1876 PG 679 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MOHAVE COUNTY AZ. *JOAN McCALL, MOHAVE COUNTY RECORDER* 04/17/91 1:30 P.M. PAGE 1 OF 10 MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RECORDING FEE 0.00 He UICROFILMfD fD BY RESOLUTION NO. 91-92 ~ \ \" t' j i.1 F t" (,;J-:~ '.'. y S3 . _I. - ,r] ;! (2. <- ~,-" (!-..~. '/ ~' ~'I 1-.." "2 >... A RESOLUTION SET'rING FORTH APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN FOR VISTA LAGUNA COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES, TRACT 3038, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 14 NORTH, RANGE 20 WEST, LOCATED IN THE LAKE HAVASU AREA, MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA WHEREAS, at the special meeting of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors held on April 15, 1991, a public hearing was conducted to determine the approval of the preliminary subdivision plan for Vista Laguna Country Club Estates, Tract 3038, and WHEREAS, the owner/developer of this tract is Vista Laguna Investment, a limited partnership, Los Angeles, California. The engineering firm responsible for the preparation of the overall plan and the drainage study is Stovall Engineers, Incorporated of Bullhead City, Arizona, and WHEREAS, the proposed site is located just outside the north boundary of Lake Havasu City and west of London Bridge Road. The site is accessed by taking Highway 95 south to Chenoweth then west approximately one mile then south on London Bridge Road approximately one mile to the proposed Windsor Way, and . . . ..' . BY, . 2 OF 10 1876 PG 680 (FEEt91-18266) Resolution No. 91-92 Page 2 WHEREAS, the developer, Vista Laguna Investment, is proposing development of a 290 acre site divided into seven parcels, 297 single-family residential lots and 1 commercial lot. The proposed zoning is SO/R-O, R-M, C-2, and C-RE. Proposed land uses include an 18 hole Golf Course, driving and putting range, recreation/restaurant/club house, visitors center motel, R-V storage, multifamily dwellings, open space and a wastewater treatment facility. Multifamily dwelling type will be townhomes comprising 895 dwelling units, and WHEREAS, water, electric and telephone will be provided by Citizens Utilities. Sewage will be serviced by an on-site wastewater treatment plant. Effluent will be reused on the golf course, and WHEREAS, the project's close proximity to the Wildlife Refuge has been recognized as an issue area, and WHEREAS, the developer, after review of the County Subdivision Regulations as it relates to minimum lot size, has elected to increase all single family and individual dwelling lots to a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet, and WHEREAS, the Commission at their meeting on March 13, 1991 did recommend conditional approval of the preliminary subdivision Resolution No. 9~2 . Page 3 plan and petition of exception for Tract 3038, with the following noted: PAGE 3 OF 10 BK 1876 PG 681 (FEEt91-18266) 1. A petition of exception request is submitted as follows: a. Lot lines that are listed as follows: lots 28 & 29, 30 & 6, Parcel B. not perpendicular or radial are Block 1, Parcel G; Block 2, 31; Block 5, Parcel B; Block b. All street sections are to be inverted crown in lieu of standard crown. c. Eight (8') foot public utility easements on lot frontage instead of sixteen (16') foot rear lot utility easements. d. Block lengths of Blocks 1, 2, 5 and 6 are in excess of standard lengths. e. No alleys at rear of commercial lot 24 in Block 5. The developer states the special circumstances or conditions which warrant these deviations from the design standards are as follows: a. The non-radial lot lines have been used to minimize the creation of deep gores which are difficult for the property owner to fence or maintain. The proposed golf course has also had an influence upon the placement of Parcel boundaries. b. The inverted crown section will fit well within this type of project enabling the relief of waters at specific points. Being a rolling golf course the grades of the roads are all expected to exceed the minimum one percent grades for this type of road. c. The eight ( 8 ') foot utility easement along the front of the lots is preferred by the utility companies for underground services. d. The blocks as designed are around the proposed golf course and provide adequate service within their loops. Those blocks abutting the boundary lines have no access through the government owned property adjacent to those boundaries. e. Lot 24 of Block 5 as the intended club house and pro shop for Lhe gol f course, will require direct access to that course . Delivery of supplies will be along delineated parking and driveways. . ' . IE ~ OF 10 1876 PG 682 (FEE~91-18266) Resolution No. 91-92 Page 4 The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Petition of Exceptions based on the aforementioned justifications. 2. The conditional approval of this subdivision is based on the understanding of the Planning and Zoning Commission that all streets within the subdivision will be constructed and paved with asphaltic concrete in accordance with Standard Specifications #171 and #10l.10D or better; the streets shall include curb and gutter; use of inverted crowns is accepted; a water supply and distribution system including fire flow will be constructed to serve each lot; grading and drainage related improvements will be made to extend underground electric and telephone service to each lot in accordance with Arizona Corporation Commission regulations and as recommended by the design engineer in the submitted drainage reports; as approved by Public works Department, run off will be contained within tract boundaries; approval for water system and sewage disposal shall be obtained from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality prior to recording the Final Plat; water availability statement to be obtained from the Arizona Department of Water Resources; all lots and street centerline monuments will be staked and monumented in accordance with Standard Specification #102; fire hydrants will be provided at locations prescribed by the Desert Hills Fire Department; street name and regulatory signs will be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Mohave County Subdivision Regulations and as recommended by the design engineer and; the owner / subdivider is responsible for the completion of improvements and shall provide assurance for required subdivision improvements in accordance with Article V of the subdivision regulations. 3. The developer will make the same commitments for improvements in the prospectus to the State Real Estate Commission as is required for approval of this tract by the Board. 4. A corporate entity for this project shall be formed/ allow for provisions of perpetual maintenance for this project's block walls, park areas, or any other facility deemed private in nature, as detailed in the CC&R's. Moreover, the articles of incorporation, forming the property owner's association, shall be submitted. . IE BK 5 OF 10 1876 PG 683 (FEE~91-18266) Resolution No. 91-92 Page 5 5. A final copy of the CC&R's shall be submitted with the FINAL PLAT. 6. Each parcel shall be designated by a capital letter starting with "A" continuing in sequence or without duplicated numbers and without hyphenated combinations (each parcel that is not contiguous shall have its own identification) . 7. Details of the combined easements shall be delineated on each sheet and a roadway easement extended to the north property line. 8. Where roads are contiguous to property lines, a vehicular non-access easement and barrier shall be provided in the form of a 6' block wall and/or Ocotillo Cacti depending on the location of the vehicle non- access easement. 9. Where property lies contiguous to Fish and Wildlife property, a total non-access easement shall be provided except at the Northeast corner where utility easements and emergency ingress/egress shall be provided. 10. Drain arrows shall indicate all drainage flow and developer shall contain on-site generated runoff within tract boundaries. 11. The package interior of boundaries. for approval sewer plant shall be located within the the site away from Fish and Wildlife (Specific site selected shall be reviewed by Commission staff). . 12. Windsor Way shall have complete right-of-way, radius curves at intersection with London Bridge Road and Abandonment or extinguishment of overlying ingress/ egress easements. 13. The purpose of block 7 & 8 shall be shown and designated as either a lot or a parcel. 14. The Special Development (SD) plan shall be submitted prior to the cutoff for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at which the request is desired to be heard. The multifamily parcels shall be submitted as a separate SD plan for review simultaneous to the above submittal. 15. All lot numbers shall be sequential within the block. . . BK 6 OF 10 1876 PG 684 (FEE~91-18266) Page 6 Resolution No. 91-92 16. Private interior streets shall be clarified and separated by a solid line from streets to be dedicated. Private streets shall be issued a parcel number. Private street parcels shall be separate from other parcels. 17. The zoning application shall be specific. If zero side yard setbacks are proposed, this shall be spelled out in the application. Firewalls shall be provided for common walls of structures in accordance with County Building Code in effect at the time of permit application. Lots having zero sideyard setbacks shall have ten feet on the opposite side lot line with a three foot overhang and a 2-10' maintenance easement shall be provided if zero lot lines are not a common firewall. 18. Article VII, Section 7.5C of Mohave County Subdivision Regulations states: "Special Development Zoning May: Allow clusters of buildings on less than the' standard minimum lot size, when a corresponding contiguous open or recreational area brings the total area to the minimum required under Section 25 of the Zoning Regulations, and if provisions are made to insure that each lot owner has equal , undivided interest in the contiguous parcel". The Planning and Zoning Commission has allowed up to 50% reduction of common space dependent upon provisionally approved amenities. This same rule applies to the multifamily developments. 19. Proper building setbacks from the easement designated by Docket 1342 Page 200, specifically Block 8, lot 1, shall be observed. 20. Comments from the Public Works Department shall be addressed: see Exhibit "A". 'l'his may result in a redesign and rehearing of the preliminary plan. 21. The following comments shall be considered in relation to street names: see Exhibit "B". 22. As a condition of approval the primary access shall be designed as a divided boulevard which will have two (2) lanes each providing ingress and egress. The egress shall have both separate left and right hand turn lanes. The center median shall utilize rolled curbs to assure emergency vehicles can navigate the median. The design shall be approved by the County Engineer. The developer may, as an alternate design, provide a secondary access to the project which could reduce the Resolu~n No. 91-92 . Page 7 primary entrance design to one (1) each ingress/egress lane with separate left and right hand turn lanes on the egress. The developer shall also provide an emergency vehicle access separate from the primary or secondary access. The principal concern of the Planning Commission is due to the high density of individual lots as well as the proposed multifamily sites both in number and density. Couple this with a golf course, its associated traffic and the one access proposed for the PUD (Planned Unit Development) creates a condition that should this single access be temporarily blocked would create serious problems could occur. 23. Five prints of a NEW PRELIMINARY PLAN submitted prior to final plan submittal in the Planning Director may determine whether proper revisions have been completed. shall be order that or not the WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on April 1, 1991, the Board of Supervisors referred this preliminary plan back to the Planning and Zoning staff to allow time for the developer and project engineer to correct deficiencies in the plan, and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors, at their special meeting on Monday, April 15, 1991, conditionally approved this preliminary subdivision plan and petitions of exception as recommended by the Mohave County Planning and Zoning Commission and outlined herein. MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LOis~~aL I::t.t:~ PAGE 7 OF 10 BK 1876 PG 685 (FEE:91-18266) . i"i.H,a/T 1-\ , II ;1 ,I !; I' 1\ :i II Ii I Ii i: -......--"'..-....-.--.----.......,.......--. ...,. ~.,...r...::........._~~......~.,.......... '. .l.:......,.....n._VI.'q-~. MOHAVE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 3675 ANDY DEVINE AVENUE. SUITE C. KINGMAN. ARIZONA 86401 TELEPHONE (602) 757-0910 FAX (602) 757-0912 County Engineer H.J. Ganyo. P.E. Richard A. Skalicky. P.E. Director Roads M, Esquibel Flood Control District Date: March 12, 1991 PAGE BK 8 OF 10 1876 PG 686 (FEE~91-18266) Re: Harold J Ganyo, P.E., County Engineer Ji~ett, Planning and Zoning Vis~agUna Country Club Estates, Tract 3038 From: To: 1. The flow split problem referencd to on page 68 of the drainaqe report needs to be analyzed to determine the probability of this occurrence and its impact on the proposed development. 2. On-site flows need to be addressed and finalized to include all capaci ties and dimensions of all necessary channels, dl:ainage structures, drainage ways, streets, easements, etc... (Article 6.4-3) 3. The treatment of flow diversion ratios along Highway 95 need to be analyzed and presented to this office for review. 4. A general description of the existing and/or proposed methods of handling storm runoff needs to be addressed for the on and oEf- site flows impacting this development and provide a method where these flows will be directed into the appropriate drainageways to insure all lots will be protected from the 100 year flood. 5. The onsite runoff from this development needs utilizing the rational method comparing the development Q's. to be addressed pre and post 6. The method of handling runoff needs to demonstrate how flows will be turned at 90 deg. ang I es and conveyed over the s tree t sections along with detailed sketches and supporting calculations. 7. The benchmark elevation needs to be referenced as to its origin, such as book and page, map, plat, ADOT, USGS, etc... 8. The preliminary plan indicates that only 4" of aggregate base is to be provided for the street sections. I f I ess than 6" of aggregate base is proposed, Mohave County Standard Specifications require soils tests be submitted to this Department that demonstrate the resulting base is equivalent in strength and stability to the 6" aggregate base course required under this specification. (55. 150.01) Building/Ground Maintenance Owcn R. Shultz Emergency Services Director Jcrry D, Hill Landfill Parks Department Tom Brady Equipment/Vehicle Maintenance CL. Key . . PAGE 9 OF 10 BK 1876 PG 687 (FEE~91-18266) vista Laguna continued 9. The proposed lots for the commercial areas wi thin blocks 7, and 8 need to be shown on the preliminary plan. (Article 3.6-2D) lO. The location, names, width, and purpose of all existing or proposed highways, streets, rights of ways, utilities, lots, blocks, easements or drainageways within the proposed subdivision or contiguous to it need to be shown on the preliminary plan. (Article 3.6-2D) ll. The R\W detail shown on page one on the preliminary plan need~ to reference where the detail is located. 12. Petition of exceptions will be required for the following items: A) Inverted crown streets. B) Blocks longer than 1320 feet. c) short blocks. D) Half width PUE's fronting lots. 13. Article 6.7-SE requires that all parcels be designated by Capital letters and be in sequential order beginning with "A". What is the parcel at the northeast side of Block 5 to be used for? 14. Are any of the parcels to be used for utility or drainage purposes? If so, Article 3.6-2D indicates that the purpose should be shown on the preliminary plan. 15. The preliminary plan makes reference to a future access road, is there another access road that is not shown on the plan? It is the recomendation of this department that an alternate means of access be provided to a subdivision of this density. The traffic safety at the access roads intersection with London Bridge Road and the Emergency vehicle access appears to dictate that an alternate access be provided. l6. A radius should be provided on the R/W at the intersection of the access road and London Bridge Road. 17. This Department recommends that approval of the pre I iminary plan be conditional upon an acceptable revised drainage report being submitted to this Department and the aforementioned comments being addressed to the County Engineers satisfaction. 2 of 2 , ,. ;a . . r'.' . . PAGE 10 OF 10 BK 1876 PG 688 (FEE~91-18266) EXHIBIT B The following comments shall be considered in relation to street names for Vista Laguna, Tract 3038, for the New Preliminary and Final Plat submittals: A. Birdie Drive and Court are satisfactory names. D. Fairway is acceptable, but not as a circle; the west segment shall be named Fairway West. B. There is an unnamed stem road between Par and Birdie, to Birdie Way. A street name will be required. C. Eagle is a duplicate name, another name will be required. E. Par is usable, but not for the total area shown; two additional names shall be provided. F. Windsor is a duplicate name, another name will be required; Laguna or Vista Laguna is suggested. G. Sand is used as a street name in Lake Havasu City.