Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-182 ... . . mDEXEIl ..........."">> ._ft~ -.,3'" , ~; ~ - ~ ~~ .- 40698 BK 192; PG 881 ~. ,IAL RECORDS OF MOHAVE COUHTY AZ. *JOAN McCALL, MOHAVE COUHTY RECORDER* 07/29/91 3=15 P.M. PAGE 1 OF 7 MOHAVE COUHTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RECORDING FEE 0.00 He RESOLUTION NO. 91-182 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH APPROVAL OF A "REVISED" PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN FOR LOS LAGOS, PHASE II, TRACT 4096, EXCLUDING TRACT 4096-A, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, LOCATED IN THE SOUTH MOHAVE VALLEY AREA, MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors held on July 1, 1991, a public hearing was conducted to determine the approval of the revised preliminary subdivision plan for Los Lagos, Phase II, Tract 4096, and WHEREAS, the owner of this project is Los Lagos Limited Partnership of Santa Ana, California. The engineer of record is William E. Miller, P.E. of Holland West, Inc., Englewood, Colorado and Bullhead City, Arizona, and WHEREAS, the project site is located approximately one (I) mile east of Highway 95 on the north side of Boundary Cone Road. The project site is 263.12 acres in size. The developer proposes 82.3 acres to be developed in single family residential use and 180.82 acres to be developed as golf course, drainage easement, public utilities easement and right-of-way. . The proposal " , i includes 596 lots with a density of 2.3 dwelling units per acre, i I ,_.J and . . Resolution No. 91-~ . Page 2 PAGE 2 OF 7 BK 192~ PG 882 (FEE~91-40698) WHEREAS, water will be supplied by Bermuda Water Company. Sewage treatment will be provided by Sorrenson Sewer Company. Gas will be provided by Southwest Gas, and Mohave Electric Cooperative will supply electricity, and WHEREAS, the Commission at their meeting on June 12, 1991 did recommend conditional approval of the preliminary subdivision plan for Tract 4096, with the following noted: 1. Petitions of Exception were submitted for the following exceptions: a. Eight foot Public Utility Easements at the front lot lines; b. Inverted crown streets; f -.: r c. Non-radial lot lines and reduced front lot widths; d. Block lengths less than five hundred (500) feet and in excess of one thousand three hundred twenty (1320) feet; e. Lots fronting along an arterial route; f. Lot frontages of less than forty (40') feet. The special circumstances or conditions which warrant these deviations from the design standards are as follows: a. Granting of a Petition for eight (8') foot PUE at the front of lot lines will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other adjacent properties because eight (8') foot front lot line easements will be adequate for the needed utilities. The proposed easement will allow the installation of the needed utilities and the special circumstances or conditions affecting said property are as follows: The sanitary sewer and water are to be located in the street and telephone, gas and electric can be placed underground in the eight (8') foot easement and right- of-way behind the back of curb. This would eliminate the need for a full sixteen (16') foot easement on the rear lot lines b. Areas of this project require the use of inverted crown streets in order to provide greater carrying capacity for storm water runoff and to complement the drainage report. . . Resolution No. 91-~ . Page 3 PAGE 3 OF 7 ~K 1924 PG 883 (FtE~91-~067S) c. Due to the drainage flows through the parcel and to create unified neighborhood concepts, some curving street patterns and cul-de-sacs were used to accomplish good circulation routes. Because of this, the usage of non-radial lot lines and reduced front lot widths is necessary. Additional lot depths and rear widths are provided to maintain the minimum six thousand (6, 000) square feet of lot area in this subdivision. d. This request for block lengths less than five hundred (500') feet and in excess of one thousand three hundred and twenty (1,320') feet is required due to the golf course concept of the layout. e. The subdivision is designed with lots fronting along Bison Avenue which is designed as an arterial route within this' subdivision. Due to configuration of drainage, residential and golf course areas, it is acceptable to permit a minimal number of lots fronting on Bison Road. f. There are a few lots that have frontages of less than forty (40') feet. These are mainly found in some cul-de-sacs where minimum widths have been kept to thirty five (35') feet. These lots will be at least forty (40') feet at the front set back. Each will have more than adequate width for access and easements, and the ability to build homes within the current setbacks will not be effected. Staff recommends approval of the Petitions of Exception based on the aforementioned justifications. 2. The conditional approval of this subdivision is based on the understanding of the Planning and Zoning Commission that all streets within the subdivision will be constructed and paved with asphaltic concrete in accordance with Standard Specifications #171 and #101.10D or better; the streets shall include curb and gutter; use of inverted crowns is accepted; a water supply and distribution system including fire flow will be constructed to serve each lot; grading and drainage related improvements will be made as recommended by the design engineer in the submitted drainage reports; arrangements will be made to extend underground electric and telephone service to each lot in accordance with Arizona Corporation Commission regulations; approval for water system and sewage disposal shall be obtained from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality prior to recording the Final Plat; water availability statement to be obtained from the Arizona Department of Water Resources; all lots and street centerline monuments will be staked and monumented in accordance with Standard Specification #102; fire hydrants will be provided at locations prescribed by the Fort Mojave Mesa Fire Department; street name and regulatory signs will be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Mohave County Subdivision Regulations .." .' Resolution N~1-182 . Page 4 PAGE 4 OF 7 BK 1924 PG 884 (FEE~91-40698) and as recommended by the design engineer and; the owner/subdivider is responsible for the completion of improvements and shall provide assurance for all required subdivision improvements in accordance with Article V of the Subdivision Regulations. 3. The developer will make the same commitments for improvements in the prospectus to the State Real Estate Commission as is required for approval of this tract by the Board. 4. A corporate entity for this project shall be formed for provisions of perpetual maintenance for this project's block walls, drainage easements, or any other facilities deemed private in nature, but are open to the public. Articles of incorporation shall be submitted with Final Plans. 5. The Arizona that there is subdivision. Department of Water Resources determine adequate water supply to serve this 6. The Arizona Department of Environmental Quali ty approves the water supply and distribution system and sewage disposal system. 7. The County Engineer has made recommendations in regard to the drainage report and the revised preliminary plan as submitted, and are as follows: a. If construction of Phase II is to be completed prior to the development of Parcel Q (Multi-family) in Phase I, this Department recommends the developer be required to fully improve Mountain View Road with Phase II from Boundary Cone Road northerly to the phase I improvement; b. Details along with supporting calculations need to be provided for all proposed drainage control structures showing design capacities and demonstrating adequacy and ability to withstand the impact and flows of the 100-year storm event. This shall include on- grade crossings, drop structures, etc. This information may be submitted with the Final plat and improvement plans; c. The developer needs to clarify whether the interior roadways are to be public or private and whether, as in the first phase, these roadways are to be maintained by the property owner's association. If private, a petition of exception is required; d. The Public Works Department recommends drainage control structures (i.e. channels, drop structures, crossings, etc.) be designated to be maintained by the property owner's association; J Resolution No. 91-~ . Page 5 PAGE 5 OF 7 BK 1924 PG 885 (FEE~91-40698) e. Some roadway curves wi thin this development appear excessive. Geometric design of roadways need to be evaluated in accordance with current AASHTO Standards for street design; f. It appears that flows exiting the property along Parcel J will be increased and concentrated because of this development. The Public Works Department recommends a design be required in this area to return flows to at or less than historic condition; g. The Public Works Department recommends drainage related improvements be required at the outflow points of this development along Boundary Cone Road to protect this road from storm damage. Should there be ,a substantial redesign of the preliminary plan as presented, due to changes drainage plan as presented, the owner/subdivider required to resubmit this subdivision as a preliminary plan for review and consideration. revised in the wi II be revised 8. The Planning Commission has made several technical observations concerning this plat. These observations shall be reflected on the new preliminary submittal and staff will provide the project engineer with these observations in a written response. The new preliminary plan submittal shall be accompanied by all documents pertinent to the acceptance of the New Preliminary. These recommendation include, but are not limited to: a. ALL dimensions to be shown; b. The Zoning Resolution, 90-36, to be amended prior to submittal of Final Plat (by submittal of a new "S-D" Plan); c. Petition of Exception requesting paved streets different from Mohave County Public Works standards; d. Clarification of status of roads and drainage over El Paso Gas Pipeline easement; e. Clarification of status and depth of "irrigation pond" ; f. Three (3') foot wall diagram on sheet 1 of 5 (maps) to be corrected to read "six (6') feet" in height; g. Delete the letter following the Tract number and replace with "PHASE II" on all sheets. "B" will be the designation for the next phased Final submitted; h. Engineer's seal and signature to be dated; '" . Resolution No. 91~ . Page 6 PAGE 6 OF 7 BK 1924 PG 886 (FEE~91-40698) i. Drainage to the west and northwest of the project, sheet 2 of 5, to be labeled; j. Boundary Cone Road and Bison Road to be represented by a solid rather than dashed line; k. One (1') foot vehicular non access easement to be provided and labeled along Bison Road, other than along lot frontages on said road; l. Clarification of unlabeled dashed lines on all maps; m. Clarification of double dashed lines along the backside of all lots in Block 9; n. Parcel V and W to be labeled "Drainage Easement" or "D.E."; o. Draft and label Mohave Electric Cooperative easement along the east boundary; p. Clarification of "sediment pond" on sheet 4 of 5; q. Draft Lot and Block numbers for the seven (7) lots along the western boundary of sheet 5 of 5; r. Clarification of ownership parcel shown on Assessors maps Boundary Cone Road within the "Parcel J"; of the one (1) acre which is fronting on drainage easement of s. A six (6') foot opaque fence or wall shall be required along all vehicular non-access easements (VNE) behind the homes on the north boundary of this subdivision as amended. Golf course parcels shall be required a barrier that prohibits vehicle access over the VNE' s . These barriers may be other than block walls, if so the barriers must be approved by the Director of Planning & Zoning. They may be cable, vegetation, or earthwork/landscaping where the golf course parcels abut the roadways or adjacent property; t. Provide a legal document, including an legal description providing for maintenance course and open areas; adequate of go 1 f u. A narrative description of phasing for this Tract to be submitted with new preliminary and reflected on map to include the seven (7) phases stated the in the owner's statement; . '" ,( .. . r I' i i.1 ! "I I I U Resolution No. 91~ . Page 7 PAGE 7 OF 7 BK 1924 PG 887 (FEE~1-40698) v. Correct Parcel B to read "PUE" rather than "PUD". 9. A NEW Preliminary plan shall be submitted prior to final plan submittal for approval by the Planning Director. This is to determine whether or not the proper revisions as noted in this Resolution have been completed. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors, at their regular meeting on Monday, July 1, 1991, conditionally approved this preliminary subdivision plan as recommended by the Mohave County Planning and Zoning Commission and outlined herein. MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~ - ;;l~~~A Lois J. H~bafd, Chairman.