HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-285
- .~ ~
4 [)0c)
.
.ROfllMEiJ
'It
3
';
rntJEXEO:
~91- - 58194 BK 1964 PG ,,1
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MOHAVE COUNTY AZ.
*JOAN McCALL, MOHAVE COUNTY RECORDER*
10/25/91 2:45 P.M.'PAGE 1 OF 4
MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
RECORDING FEE 0.00 He
RESOLUTION NO. 91-285
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH APPROVAL OF A PETITION OF EXCEPTION
FOR THIRTY (30') FOOT INVERTED CROWN PAVING FOR STREET WIDTHS IN
PINE RIVER ESTATES, TRACT 4128, BEING THE N~ SE~ NE~ SW~ SECTION
25, TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, LOCATED IN THE SOUTH MOHAVE
VALLEY AREA, MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA.
WHEREAS, at the special meeting of the Mohave County Board
of Supervisors held on October 21, 1991, a public hearing was
conducted to determine the approval of the Petition of Exception
for twenty-four (24') foot inverted crown street widths in Pine
River Estates, Tract 4128, located in the South Mohave Valley
area, and
WHEREAS, the preliminary subdivision plan for the subject
-',
project has been approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 4,
1991. That approval also included the approval of a petition of
exception for design of inverted streets in the project, and
WHEREAS, since this small project has only a short section
of street and drainage control from offsite is minor or
nonexistent, it was decided to design streets with inverted
crowns in order to maintain consistency with adjacent projects.
The street is a cul-de-sac and has very limited traffic.
Therefore, the design width was intended to be the minimum of
.~
~,
Resolution No.
--------
91.85
.
Page 2
PAGE 2 OF 4
BK 196~ PG 42 (FEE~91-58194)
twenty-four (24') feet of pavement which was the minimum for cul-
de-sac standard crown sections [without curb and with ditches].
A two (2') foot curb is incorporated in the design which is also
consistent with adjacent projects, and
WHEREAS, this petition is submitted as a request that the
Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Supervisors the
granting of an exception from the Subdivision Regulat1.ons as
outlined in Article 1.13 for the following reasons:
1. The granting of this petition will not be detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to other adjacent
property because the design specifically provides for
greater safety and health measures. Due to the nature
of the design, there is no impact on adjacent property.
2. This request will not nullify the intent or purpose of
the General Plan of the County or other regulations
because the design provides for circulation for and use
of the property in conformance to the regulations as was
ruled previously in the approved petition.
3. The special circumstances or conditions affecting the
property are that the adjacent projects are designed
wi th inverted streets with concrete curbs to control
drainage and pass drainage through the project without
damage and minimize maintenance costs to the County.
Consistency with those adjacent projects is a major
consideration. The 100-year storm flows are contained
within the improved street section, a special feature of
the project design.
WHEREAS, the Commission, at their meeting on Wednesday,
October 9, 1991 recommended APPROVAL for a MODIFIED Petition of
Exception for Inverted Crown Street Widths that are thirty (30')
feet curb face to curb face.
The Commission further recommends
that the curb section conform to Standard Detail #40, Type "B" as
set forth in the Standard Specifications and Standard Details of
the Mohave County Subdivision Regulations.
The County Engineer
-;,
~.'\
l,_ /,
Resolution No. 91~z85
Page 3
PAGE 3 OF 4
BK 1964 PG 43 (FEE~91-53194)
in his recommendation with concurrence of the Planning Staff are
attempting to be uniform and consistent when approving Petitions
of Exception that relate to Right-of-Way Dedication and pavement
widths, and
WHEREAS, the Commission, after a full hearing on the matter,
was concerned that a tw",nty-four (24') foot wid", paving on a
closed cul-de-sac could pose a traffic safety hazar~ .as it
pertained to ingress and egress of emergency vehicles if parked
vehicles were opposite each other in the cul-de-sac, and
WHEREAS, the Commission felt that the thirty (30') foot
paving width was a compromise for this project. (see Exhibit "A"),
Sun Des",rt Estates and Moon Valley. That future petitions would
be at the thirty-two (32') foot paving widths.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVlm, that the Board of Supervisors,
at their sp",cial meeting on Monday, October 21, 1991 approved
this modifi",d petition of exception as recommended by the
Commission and outlined herein.
MORAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~
ice-Chairmim
--'~~'-=~-'~~~=='=~",-~-~i,._~,~~";==_._~.=_~O~"'~',=_~-"f"='.-'.~-.- .....,.,..___.,,~_~~""""',._.~~~~.:__~.,,-=,
:6# .-'10
TRACT NO.4J28 ..
RIVER ESTATES
PRELIMINARY PLAN
ptJE
QjElUU'roIUAL ElrGIJ'EEltS, IE.
, 2636 HIGH\JAr 95 . SUITE 44
BULLHEAD C I rr. AR I ZONA 86442
(602) 758-7600
A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 SW 1/4
SEe 25 TI9N R22W G8SR88M
1- -
E)(\';b,t "Au
1:>OS KESOl-UrlON
No. q \ - :t8S
NotE.. ~
~ho.c!.Q.d ~V.t.~ cl.t not.ct~ APf'YOVLd
toy 30' pa-v;".; c.uy b fo.~tt -t:-o c.uvb
~CA. ~ CUrb Stc:\;o~ Std. !Ato.~ \
-:U:- 4\0 , T~ p.e.. "B n.
PAGE ~ OF ~
BK 196~ PG 44 (FEE~91-58194)
,
,
,
1
---
,//-"1
/'
I
"I_"
I
N89' 54'18'.W 2643.20.
'~'---r-.-:l
~I , ~.
. -J----t.c-i
~. . g.
:..........................b 0
: Q ~
N89' 57' 30" W : 2645.09' <!: N89" 57' 30" W 2643.76'
...........................
~l' L... .......~.r=;roJec/
" : \0 Site
__ . ___--.1_ __~
~L' I ~
Q Q.
~ N89'5nLo9. ~I N09'57'~5"W
q"
t:::
"
\0
'"
1
",.
Q
Q
Q
Q
<!:
_26443/
SEC 25 TI9N R22W GBSRBBM
MOHAVE COUNTY, AZ,
FIELD SURVEY DATA