HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-284
~tbb
.
'l
lr.n0rl' '.
1 f\ " I r.::.~..
.1 ., - .
EXFll
=::91- 58193 BK 1964 PG 3
~~FICI~L RECORDS OF MOHAVE COUNTY AZ.
*~DAN McCALL, MOHAVE COU~TY RECORDER*
lu/25/91 2:45 P.M. PAGE 1 OF 4
NOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
:"'.0:- :"'..~"""'"",,, :-":""f"'" .-. ./"'..-' II^
'r\i:.\..ui-\u Hi\:! r i:.t=. V. i.iU No"
.li
~
RESOLUTION NO. 91-284
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH APPROVAL OF A PETITION OF EXCEPTION
FOR THIRTY (30') FOOT INVERTED CROWN PAVING FOR STREET WIDTHS IN
SUN DESERT ESTATES, TRACT 412l, BEING THE NE~ SW~ SECTION 25,
TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, LOCATED IN THE SOUTH MOHAVE
VALLEY AREA, MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA.
WHEREAS, at the special meeting of the Mohave County Board
of Supervisors held on October 21, 1991, a public hearing was
conducted to determine the approval of the Petition of Exception
for twenty-four (24') foot inverted crown street widths in Sun
Desert Estates, Tract 4121, located in the South Mohave Valley
area, and
WHEREAS, the preliminary subdivision plan for the subject
project has been approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 4,
1991. That approval also included the approval of a petition of
exception for design of inverted streets in the project. In the
past, the County standard for inverted crown streets was for a
minimum forty (40') foot wide section.
This was used primarily
to carry large drainage flows through a project and still provide
on-street parking, the design width in this project was intended
to be the twenty-four (24') foot minimum pavement which was the
minimum of cul-de-sac standard crown sections, and
Resolution No. 91~4
.
Page 2
PAGE 2 OF ~
BK 1964 PG 33 (FEE~91-58193)
WHEREAS, in this project., off-site flows are carried in a
forty-eight (48') foot inverted crown street.
However, portion
of Sun Desert Lane, Van Mouwerik Drive and all of Westwind Drive
are thirty (30') feet wide since they carry no off-site flows.
In order to maintain consistency, all streets are designed with
the same inverted crown section even though not needed for
drainage control [without curb and with ditches].
A two ( 2 ' )
foot curb is incorporated in the design which is also consistent
with adjacent projects, and
WHEREAS, this petition is submitted as a request that the
Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Supervisors the
granting of an exception from the Subdivision Regulations as
outlined in Article 1.13 for the following reasons:
1. The granting of this petition will not be detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to other adjacent
property because the design specifically provides for
greater safety and health measures. Due to the nature
of the design, there is no impact on adjacent property.
2. This request will not nullify the intent or purpose of
the General Plan of the County or other regulations
because the design provides for circulation for and use
of the property in conformance to the regulations as was
ruled previously in the approved petition.
3. The special circumstances or conditions affecting the
property are that the adjacent projects are designed
with inverted streets with concrete curbs to control
drainage and pass drainage through the project without
damage and minimize maintenance costs to the County.
Consistency with those adjacent projects is a major
consideration. The 100-year storm flows are contained
within the improved street section, a special feature of
the project design.
WHEREAS, the Commission, at their meeting on Wednesday,
October 9, 1991 recommended APPROVAl. for a MODIFIED Petition of
--
Resolution No. 9~84
.
Page 3
Exception for Inverted Crown Street Widths that are thirty (30')
feet curb face to curb face.
The Commission further recommends
that the curb section conform to Standard Detail #40, Type lIB" as
set forth in the Standard Specifications and Standard Details of
the Mohave County Subdivision Regulations.
The County Engineer
in his recommendation with concurrence of the Planning Staff are
attempting to be uniform and consistent when approving Petitions
of Exception that relate to Right-of-Way Dedication and pavement
widths, and
WHEREAS, the Commission, after a full hearing on the matter,
was concerned that a twenty-four (24') foot wide paving on local
streets could pose a traffic safety hazard as it pertained to
ingress and egress of emergency vehicles if parked vehicles were
opposite each other, and
WHEREAS, the Commission felt that the thirty (30') foot
paving width was a compromise for this project (see Exhibit "A"),
Moon Valley and Pine River Estates. That future petitions would
be at the thirty-two (32') foot paving widths.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors,
at their special meeting on Monday, October 21, 1991 approved
this modified petition of exception as recommended by the
Commission and outlined herein.
MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~
ice-Chairman
PAGE 3 OF 4
BK 1964 PG 39 (FEE~91-58193)
J I IMv I IVV. LfIC:/~
sa DESERT ESTA S
PRELIM/NARY PLAN
..,... ...
\ [)
I
l!~'~,,: ~~;I~!~~: :~c.
A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 SW 1/4
~Vf:"';';\"
BAY
.:'
'"
-I
: I 44
'\
I-
"
~ ; r\,J " ,
""
i\j
11('
~ ., - J
, (f)
t" ,;,,;,,'r,,
11"'..'.....,.(1....'.
I.
, '"
l.
~
" .
; ~
f
3"
~ 1 "
~.T595rE 26<L--r-5. "89~~:~~:'.'..,.
:1 ~
~~ ~
: ---- -1--- m _Jm -----
~~ I~
~ I g
i ~'"+''' , ~
~I
i
c'
-- J
~I
I
I
'I
"-I
~)
,
.:
<:'h:...l_~,
~I
"~,
1
l_ "~~' .
','1
. '
I ' I
~. g'
')1 . ; I
~~ I i '.~ I
_ ~..t~,:t_~/~!_ ._~l__.~~. '!!.25 .vJ __.."':::..:!. '~__.J
SEC 75 TI9N R22w G8SR88M
MOHAVE COUNTY. A2
>WID SURVEY DATA
------- -.
I
1 .~; :
i.'t ~
j
"R()I'OS! (l
':.MAlfl'>MA
PAGE
BK
4 OF
1964 PG
4
40 (FEE~91-58193)
Ex he, b'lt "A"
-e05 ~e::~t..UT\ON
No.9 l- :t8C\
Nl)t.e.. :
Sh4.d~d Q~..tQS ck.no~
I\~pvov.e.d ~Y'" 30' f~"\"'9
-
CMyb fo.eJl -to ~y b To.a;
C.u.-b s...c:..tlO,," St.el. ut.t4.i
~~ I T~p-t.. "6".