HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-076
~1'
.
6
f-
~
-.:.::....
diiCROF!L!ED
I.ED
......._o_
:'::92- 12677 BK 2019 PG 3.
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MOHAVE COUNTY AZ.
*JOAN McCALL, nOHAVE COUNTY RECORDERlt
03/11/92 3:00 P.M. PAGE 1 OF 4
HOHAVE COUHTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
RECORDING FEE 0.00 Ne
RESOLUTION NO. 92-76
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CONDITIONAL
REZONING APPROVAL FOR E~ NW~ AND THE NE~ SW~ PARCEL 69, SECTION
17 , TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 18 WEST, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
RESOLUTION 91-74, LOCATED IN THE GOLDEN VALLEY AREA, MOHAVE
COUNTY, ARIZONA
WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of the Mohave County Board
of Supervisors held on March 9, 1992, a public hearing was
conducted to determine whether approval should be granted to
Thomas Day Kingman, Arizona, for an extension of time for
conditional rezoning approval for E~ NW~ and the NE~ SW~ Parcel
69, Section 17, Township 21 North, Range 18 West, Board of
Supervisors Resolution 91-74, located in the Golden Valley area,
and
WHEREAS, subject property is accessed from Highway 68, via
Verde road south approximately one-half (~) mile to Shipp Drive
then west approximately eight hundred (800') feet on the south
side of the road. This parcel is bounded on three sides by the
Rancho Verde, Tract 3011, and
WHEREAS the Board
approved BOS Resolution 91-74 at their
regular meeting of March 4, 1991, for the original rezoning
action, and
.
.
PA. 2 OF
BK '~019 PG
.4
37 (FEE~92-12677)
.
""""'-
Resolution No. 92-76
Page 2
WHEREAS the owner, Mr. Day, is exercising his right to
request and extension of time under condition 10 of Resolution
91-74, in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes annotated
Title 11, Chapter 6 (11-832), and
WHEREAS the applicant believes that Shipp Drive is a fee
parcel owned by Mohave County, and
WHEREAS the owner has requested that the proposed dedicated
road, formally approved as a forty (40') foot dedicated road, be
a thirty (30') ingress/egress easement with an eight (8') foot
PUE lying between this easement and the fence.
The Commission
has no problem with the ingress/egress, but recommends that it
also be a PUE to facilitate services crossing it, and
WHEREAS a turn around is not essential if the easement is to
be used.
The owner is requesting deletion of the VNAE
requirement. The Commission considered this and recommends a one
(1') foot VNAE would help protect contiguous properties and
should be retained along the east boundary of the property. The
Commission further recommends that it can be included in the PUE
with no fence or wall required, and
WHEREAS the County Attorney's of f ice, the Assessor's maps
and the Planning and Zoning staff concur that no fee title was
.
----
pi 30F
BK 2019 PG
4
38 (FEE~92-12677)
Resolution No. 92-76
Page 3
transferred in 1966.
The original Resolution 91-74 requesting
abandonment of the fifty (50') foot ingress/egress & PUE easement
and dedication of a forty-two (42') foot ROW retaining the south
eight (8') as a PUE should be followed, and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing before the Mohave County
Planning and Zoning Commission on February 12,
1992, the
Commission recommended conditional APPROVAL of the requested
extension of time with the applicant understanding and accepting
the following conditions:
1. Extension of time to March 4, 1993, and that Resolution
91-74 remain as approved with the exception that the
access be a thirty (30') ingress/egress and PUE with an
eight (8') foot PUE lying east of it. No curve radius
required at Shipp Drive and easement. Provisions will
not be required for a turn around at the terminus of
this access in accordance with and meeting the standard
set forth in the Mohave County Regulations.
At the request of Roger Esquerra, cartographer, Commission
recommends Final Plat and Parcel plat boundaries be a triple wide
line as the 1/8" blue line border obscures dimensions, and
WHEREAS, the notice of hearing was published in the Kingman
Daily Miner, a newspaper of general circulation in Kingman,
Mohave County, Arizona, on February 23, 1992, and posted February
21, 1992 as required by Arizona Revised Statutes, and the Mohave
County Zoning Regulations.
..
, ..
.
PA' .4 OF
BK 2019 PG
.4
39 (FEE~92-12677)
Resolution No. 92-76
Page 4
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors,
at their regular meeting on Monday, March 9, 1992 approved this
change in zoning as recommended by the Mohave County Planning and
Zoning Commission and outlined herein.
MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTEST:
~:b-;N /id/~(
Lois J. Hubbard{Chairrnan