The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About92-395 f~ ) r\ ~'J \0 . 4JNDEXEQI AflCRDFil.Mu 31 ~92- 67580 BK 21-4-6 PG 828 OFFICIAL RECORDS Of nOHAVE COUNTY AZ. *JOAN MoCALL, MOHAVE COUNTY RECORDER* 12/08/92 4:00 P.M. PAGE 1 OF 5 MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RECORDING FEE 0.00 He RESOLUTION NO. 92-395 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE REZONING OF THE E!o:z E!o:z PARCEL 5, GOLD ROAD STATION UNIT 5, SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 20 NORTH, RANGE 19 WEST, FROM: A-R/10A (AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL/TEN ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE) ZONE, PROPOSED TO BE: A- R/4A (AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL/FOUR ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE) ZONE, LOCATED IN THE GOLDEN VALLEY AREA, MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of the Mohave County Board of supervisors held on December 7, 1992, a public hearing was conducted to determine whether approval should be granted to Jessica Michael of Kingman, Arizona, for the rezoning of the E~ E!z ParcelS, Goldroad Station Unit 5, Section 2, Township 20 North, Range 19 West, from the existing A-R/10A (Agricultural Residential/Ten Acre Minimum Lot Size) to A-R/4A zone, (Agricultural Residential/Four Acre Minimum Lot Size) zone, located approximately eight hundred (800') feet east of Jade Road on the north side of Moenkopi Road in the Golden Valley area, and WHEREAS, Section 2 is approximately eight and one-half (8.5) miles west of the Highway 68 and 93 junction and approximately four and one-half (4.5) miles south of Highway 68. The subject property is accessed from Highway 68 via Estrella Road south approximately four and one-half. (4.5) miles to Shinarump Drive thence east approximately one-half (.5) mile to Jade Road thence south approximately one-half (.5) mile to Moenkopi Drive thence . . Resolution No. 92-395 Page 2 ; i PAGE 2 OF 5 BK 2146 PG 829 (FEE#92-67580) ~. J east approximately nine hundred (900') feet on the north side of the street, and WHEREAS, review of floodplain map #040058-2325B indicates this parcel to be clear of a designated floodplain. The property is currently occupied. Surrounding land uses consist of mostly vacant land with two (2) homes immediately to the west. The only lot splits within this unit are the actions that created three (3) parcels from Lot 5. The remainder of the unit is forty (40) acre parcels. The applicant desires to split this ten plus (10+) acre parcel into three (3) two plus (2.5+) acre parcels. This , . ; ,e, property is located immediately south of the Golden Valley Improvement District #1 and is not in the Building Code area, and WHEREAS, this case came before the Commission twice. -- The first time it ~ denied with the followinq iustifications: 1. Character of the immediate area is two (2), ten (10), and fifteen (15) forty acre parcels and approval of this action would not be in keeping with good planning practices at this time. 2. Majority of existing two and one-half (2.5) acre parcels in neighboring Golden Valley Ranchos Units 8 & 9 are vacant. 3. These items are indicators that increased density in this area is not warranted at this time. .~ -I; WHEREAS, the case was sent back to the Commission with the followinq explanation: . . Resolution No. 92-395 Page 3 PAGE 3 OF 5 BK 2146 PG 830 (FEE~92-67580) At the Board of Supervisors meeting of September 3, 1991, the applicant presented new information and intent regarding a parcel split in his testimony to the Board that was given to the Planning and Zoning Commission where a recommendation for DENIAL was generated at their August, 1991 meeting. The Board took no action, rather, returned to the Commission for a "REHEARING" to allow the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider new information. There was no specific guidance sent. It appeared the Board of Supervisors went on record of support of the Planning and Zoning Commission and would not overturn the Commission based upon new information provided the Board that was not heard by the Conunission. The Board of Supervisors desired the Commission have all pertinent information before them to make their recommendation. TESTIMONY OF APPLICANT: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - , , '. ,::"-_~ Jim Nordby, representing the applicant, urged approval of this request in that there are 2.5 acre parcels wi thin a mile of this site. The applicant plans to sell the double- wide mobile home presently on the property and build a second home on the parcel to be split out. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - Jim Nordby, representing the applicant, urged approval of this request in that they wished to create a parcel to provide a residence for aging relatives to live in close proximity. After further deliberation the Commission recommended approval and the request was qranted based on the followinq conditions: 1. These parcels be zoned A-R/4A (Agricultural- Residential/Four Acre Minimum Lot Size). 2. Submittal and recordation of a Parcel Plat prepared in accordance with Article 3.16 of the Mohave County Subdivision Regulations. 3. The establishment of a minimum lot size based on the size of parcels per the recorded Parcel Plat. , -.j 4. Each parcel shall have legal access. 5. These parcels shall meet or exceed four (4) acres exclusive of road easements. . . Resolution No. 92-395 Page 4 PAGE 4 OF 5 BK 21~6 P6 831 (FEE~92-675g0) 6. The Parcel Plat shall show any surface drainage and FEMA designated flood zones. 7. That the Board of Supervisors accept the dedication of a thirty (30') foot right-of-way and eight (8') foot PUE as they are contiguous to the eastern property line of this parcel. In addition, a twenty (20') foot radius at the intersection of the above mentioned unnamed roadway and Moenkopi Drive. This shall be approved through the recording of the resolution authorizing this zone change, and that the dedication statement and dedication be shown on the Parcel Plat. 8. No building/zoning permits shall be issued until after Parcel Plat recordation. 9. The rezone shall not become effective for at least thirty (30) days after final approval of the change in classification by the Board of Supervisor. Being November 6, 1991, as per ARS 11-829E. 1 10. If these conditions are not met within one (1) year this approval shall be void. If at the expiration of this period the property has not been improved for the use for which it was conditionally approved, the Board after notification by registered mail to the owner and applicant who requested the rezoning shall schedule a public hearing to grant an extension, determine compliance with the schedule for development or cause the property to revert to its former zoning classification in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated, Title 11, Chapter 6, 11-832. WHEREAS, the applicant has indicated they ~ ready to complete the process of meetinq the conditions but are askinq for an extension in order to qather the necessary funds to complete the parcel plat requirement, and WHEREAS, at the public hearing before the Mohaye County Planning and Zoning Commission on November 18, 1992, the Commission recommended conditional APPROVAL of the requested . . Resolution No. 92-395 Page 5 - .1 PAGE 5 OF 5 BK 21~6 PG 832 (FtE~92-675g0) extension of time with the applicant understanding and accepting the following conditions: 1. Continued compliance with conditions of Resolution No. 91-244. 2. This extension of time be granted for this use until November 6, 1993. WHEREAS, the notice of hearing was published in the Kingman Standard, a newspaper of general circulation in Kingman, Mohave County, Arizona, on November 21, 1992, and posted November 20, 1992 as required by Arizona Revised Statutes, and the Mohave County Zoning Regulations. ;;;:h~ NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors, at their regular meeting on Monday, December 7, 1992 approved the granting of this extension of time for a conditional Zone Change as recommended by the Mohave County Planning and Zoning Commission and outlined herein. ATTEST: MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 'Ylr'J?k/- Cha~rman/