HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-093
... ~
v\'
'vu'J
,.. ..,
!.~., .
I:'
./
.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-93
.
~ ~"'O!lJ.Ma)
~EXEIl.A'"'' to ~
~93- . 18624 BK 2200 PG 746
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF .MOHAVE ~OUNIY AI.
*JOAH HcCAll, MOHAVE COUNTy RE~ORDER*
04/08/93 1:00 P.n. PAGE 1 OF ~
MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
RECORDING FEE 0.00 He
EVALUATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 25 OF THE MOHAVE COUNTY
ZONING ORDINANCE TO MODIFY THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS IN THE M
(GENERAL MANUFACTURING) and MX (HEAVY MANUFACTURING) ZONES.
WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of the Mohave County Board
of Supervisors held on AprilS, 1993, a public hearing was
conducted to determine whether approval of an amendment to
Section 25 of the Mohave County Zoning Ordinance to modify the
height requirements in the M and M-X zones, and
WHEREAS, the zoning chart in Section 25 of the Mohave County
Zoning
Ordinance
deals
with
minimum
height
lot
sizes,
requirements and specific minimum setbacks from property lines.
These requirements were written along with the County's General
Plan back in 1965. At that time, the population of Mohave County
Moreover, heavy
manufacturing
industries
mostly
was just a fraction of what it is today.
to
were
limited
mining
operations.
These mining operations, for the most part, took
place on lands that were not under the County's jurisdiction, and
.,., ) 1-
.
.
Resolution 93-93
Page 2
t" :j
PAGE 2 OF 4
BK 2200 PG 7~7 (FEE~~3-18624)
WHEREAS, Mohave County has seen many changes over the past
25-30 years. The population for the County now exceeds 100,000
people.
The County's accessibility dramatically increased with
the establishment of Interstate 40, circa 1980.
This type of
accessibility has not only made the county more attractive to
industry but also to many types of commercial businesses, and
WHEREAS,
taking
the
aforementioned
changes
into
consideration, it would be logical to expect minor amendments to
the 1965 regulations.
In present times, many industries that
--,~
(') fall into the County's M and M-X zoning designations have
'.,.,/
structures that exceed a (60') height.
It is not inappropriate
to review specific structural heights at a site plan review
stage.
Section 27.P of the Mohave County Zoning Ordinance is
used as a tool for reviewing many such requirements, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing before the Mohave County Planning
and Zoning Commission on March 10, 1993 did generate a unanimous
recommendation, of those members present, of APPROVAL of an
amendment to Section 25 of the Mohave County Zoning Ordinance,
with the following changes noted:
NOTE: The old height requirement will be in Helvet~nand new
the language will be double underlined.
".
:)
-. ..
.." ~\
-- ,.',"'.j
" 'c,o;y
-?"\.
(:'~:1
"'.:cY
-;:-,
:)
.
.
Resolution 93-93
Page 3
PAGE J OF" "'62' )
BK 2200 PG 743 (F~E~93-1u ~
Section 25 SETBACKS AND AREA REQUIREMENTS (continued)
B. Specific Requirements
ZONE
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
LOT AREA (HEIGHT)
MINIMUM SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE
FRONT SIDE REAR
M
2 Acre
*****
20'
0'
0'
(60)
M-X
2 Acre
*****
20'
0'
0'
(60)
*****--Structural Heights for these two zones will be specified
at the site plan submittal in accordance with Section
27.P., and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the notice of hearing
has been met and published in a newspaper of general circulation
in Kingman, Mohave County, Arizona, as required by Arizona
Revised Statutes and the Mohave County Zoning Regulations, and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors, at their regular meeting on Monday, AprilS, 1993
approved this amendment to Section 25 of the Mohave County
Ordinance, as recommended by the Mohave County Planning and
Zoning Commission, subject to the changes outlined herein.
MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
xAJ -i44~~
Sam Standerfer, C 1rrnan
., ...
. .
PAGE ~ OF 4
6K 2200 PG 7~9 (FEE~93-1862.; )
...- --."
?ction 25 SETBACKS AND AREA REQUIREMENTS (continued)
~>.:..:..~2~1
B. Spe~ific Requirements
ZONE I MINIMUM I MAXIMUM IMINIMUM SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE
L!:QT AREA (HEIGHT) I FRONT I SIDE I REAR
A 5 Acre 2 ( 30 ' ) 20' 5' 25'*
A-D 1 Acre ( 60' ) 25' 5' 15'*
A-R 1 Acre 2 ( 30' ) 20' 5' 25'*
R-E 20,000 2 ( 30 ' ) 20' 5' 25'*
C-RE 20,000 2 ( 30 . ) 20' 5' 25'*
R-O 6,000 2 (30' ) 20' 5' 25'*
R-OjA 1 Acre 2 ( 30' ) 20' 5' 50'*
R-l 6,000 2 (30' ) 20' 5' 25'*
R-TT ***** 2 ( 30 ' ) 20' 5' 10'*
, '
R-MH 6,000 2 (30' ) 2Q' 5' 10'*
R-M 6,000 3 (40' ) 20' 5' 15'*
C-l 6,000 (45' ) 20' 0' 15'**
C-2 6,000 (45' ) 20' 0' 15'**
C-2H*** 1 Acre (45' ) 20' 0' 15'**
C-M*** 1 Acre (60' ) 20' 0' 15'**
C-MO*** 1 Acre ( 60' ) 20' 0' 15'**
M 2 Acre (60' ) 20' 0' 0'
.
M-X 2 Acre (60' ) 20: 0' 0'
S-D TO BE DETERMINED WITH APPROVAL OF DESIGN****
*-----A 10' rear yard setb~ck is allowed in conjunction wLth a Mobile
Home. See also Sections 25-A-5,. 27-F-8 and 27-G.)
**----No setback to a dedicated alley twenty feet or wider, five feet
c,7--:49,therwise. Fifteen feet to property line without any alley.
."~**---A 10,000 square foot minimum lot size is allowable in a C~2H, c-
,_~ -M, A-D or C-MO zone, when the property is served by a publ ic I
franchised water supply.