HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-360
}-
~
r- ~
. -;
\_;~: .;jJ
-..
A
.110
.
.
U\CROfllMal
tNpEXEIl f~ #5
"'9~
~ - -- _ 7 J..~ 13 SK 23"6 PG 731
U~FICI~l R~CORDS or HOHAVE COUNTY AZ
129~~~;C~~~3'O pMOHAVE COUNTY RECORDER*
v oJ. .11. PAGE 1 OF :5
R"EQ{:~AVE ~~UKTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OROIN~ FEE 0.00 He
w;J /cP
RESOLUTION NO. 93-360
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH A REZONE OF THE W~ OF PARCEL 22,
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 18 WEST, FROM A-R/10A
(AGRICULTURAL-RESIDENTIAL/TEN ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE) ZONE TO C-
2H/3A (GENERAL COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY FRONTAGE/THREE ACRE MINIMUM LOT
SIZE) ZONE AND A-R/8A (AGRICULTURAL-RESIDENTIAL/EIGHT ACRE
MINIMUM LOT SIZE) ZONE, LOCATED IN THE GOLDEN VALLEY AREA, MOHAVE
COUNTY, ARIZONA.
WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of the Mohave County Board
of Supervisors held on December 6, 1993, a public hearing was
conducted to determine whether approval should be granted for a
zone change for the above described property to owner John Day of
Kingman, Arizona, and
f?~ and ~=t P:;C~~g~~a~S 61BO,cate~hr~~_";1~1! :~~~S o~i~a ~;~t:O~~
",,~;.;..?
Highway 68 and the rest of the property is located south of the
highway. The property has no direct access from Highway 68 but
is accessed from Highway 68 via Teddy Roosevelt Road north to
Supai Drive, then east to the northwest corner of the subject
property, or from Highway 68 via Teddy Roosevelt Road south to
t Brook Drive, then east to the southwest corner of the property.
The property may also be accessed from Colorado Road, then east
on Supai Drive or Brook Drive, and
c
~
f.".;'.)~.
(D'
WHEREAS, the property is vacant with a few scattered
residences in the surrounding area, and
WHEREAS, review of Floodplain Map #040058-2325B indicates
this parcel to be in Zone C, an area of minimal flooding, and
WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to rezone the northern
portion of the parcel C-2H/3A (General Commercial Highway
Frontage/Three Acre Minimum Lot Size) and the southern portion
would remain A-R with a smaller lot size designation, and
WHEREAS, this parcel is located wi thin the Golden
Valley/Sacramento Valley Area Plan boundary. The plan designates
this area as potential Single Family Residential. No area plan
amendment has been completed to permit the proposed commercial
change, and
e.
...
:'--
. .....;"
..~...~:j
lII\
.,
'""'~~
;--. -!~'-~. ':.."\
( . :-:~t;
-"'Z"","
..
CD
.'
f~~..".,...~. -
.."..'......".. ~
. -.....,
..,.
" .....:;
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-360
PAGE 2 OF :5
BK 2326 PG 732 (FEE~~3-71513)
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Golden valley/Sacramento Valley Area Plan was
adopted per P&ZC Resolution No. 80-62. The Area Plan lists a
number of proposals that indicate the problem/situation, lists
the goals and identifies the objective/solution. Proposal H
addresses commercial properties. The plan indicates that "In an
effort to meet future demands, it is recommended that cluster
commercial districts be encouraged as opposed to strip zoning
along Highway 68 and 93. This would help protect the integrity
of the highway function, that of carrying traffic through the
area. " The plan specifically lists the areas which may be
considered for commercial zoning classifications. The subject
property is NOT one of the properties listed in the plan, and
WHEREAS, in 1987 an amendment to the Golden
Valley/Sacramento valley Area Plan regarding the areas which may
be considered for commercial zoning classifications was approved
per P&ZC Resolution No. 87 -26. The plan specifically listed
properties along Highway 68 identified for consideration for
commercial zoning that were not identified in the 1980 plan. The
parcels identified in the plan are subject to the submittal of a
development plan for a specific commercial use or activity,
together with a formal zone change application, and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning staff uses Area Plans as
guides to help direct growth and development in the County. Zone
changes without amending the area plan limits the ability of
staff to properly plan the future needs of the County, limits
community input and concerns, and overrides policies approved by
the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of Supervisors,
and
WHEREAS, this item was originally discussed at the regular
public hearing of the Mohave County Planning and zoning
Commission in March, 1993. At the public hearing the Commission
tabled the item. The applicant has requested that this item be
brought before the Commission for a recommendation, and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing before the Mohave County
Planning and Zoning Commission on November 10, 1993, the
Commission recommended DENIAL for a zone change based on the
following:
1.
The area plan indicates this area to be SFR (Single
Family Residential), and the plan has not been amended.
2.
This change would set a precedent that would encourage
changes without amending area plans, unplanned land use
changes without proper analyses and continue commercial
strip zoning along Highway 68.
..,
.
.
PAGE 3 OF 3
BK 2326 PG 733 (fEE;93-71513)
...
" -,
RESOLUTION NO. 93-360
Page 3
, )
.....,-. ..
.,-.,~~'~-~:'
WHEREAS, the notice of hearing was published in the Kingman
Daily Miner, a newspaper of general circulation in Kingman,
Mohave County, Arizona, November 21, 1993, and posted November
19, 1993, as required by Arizona Revised Statutes and the Mohave
County Zoning Regulations.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors,
.~ at their regular meeting on Monday, December 6, 1993, DENIED this
zone change as recommended by the Mohave County Planning and
Zoning Commission and outlined herein.
MORAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
I~~
\ ..." ':j
'O.:..~~~
~_ t, klwL
--5a:m--st: ftaer:Eef,--Ghai-aaaa---
Joan C. Ward, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
t
a
)l
(-.?\
\ '""1
",.Y