Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-039 ~ . INOEXEa ~[f5 MiCROfiLMED I ~) \~ ',,1 ~~....- 6867 BK 2351 PG 828 OFFICIAL R~CORDS OF HOHAVE COU~TY AI. *JCAN NoCALL, MOHAVE ,OUNfY RECOROER* ~2/03/94 2:30 P.r" PAGE 1 OF 4 MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HECORDING FEE 0.00 Ne .'~-. ""~~" "~. " / .~:_...~..... RESOLUTION NO. 94-39 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH APPROVAL OF AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR MESA VISTAS, TRACT 4117, BEING THE W~ OF THE SW~, SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 22 WP.ST, LOCATED IN THE SOUTH MOHAVE VALLEY AREA, MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA. WHEREAS, at the regular meet; Tlg of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors held on February 1, 1994, a public hearing waS conducted to determine the approval of an Extension of Time for the approved Preliminary Plan of MESA VISTAS, Tract 4117, and .' :.,.,.., WHEREAS, the owner and subdivider is Black Mountain Development of Bullhead City, Arizona. The engineer responsible for the preparation of the Drainage Report and design of this subdivision is Holland West, Inc., Denver, Colorado, and Bullhead City, Arizona, and \.. "";'.::' WHEREAS, this subdivision is located one mile east of Highway 95 and is between Camp Mohave Road and El Rodeo Road with El Rodeo Road as the primary access, and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Plan depicts approximately 42 acres subdiv ided into 14 7 6, OOO-square- foot Single Family Residential lots and a four-acre Commercial lot, and WHEREAS, the water will be supplied by Bermuda Water Company, electric power by Mohave Electric Cooperative, and telephone service by Citizens Utilities Company. Sewage disposal is proposed by package treatment plant or hookup to Sorenson Utility Company, Inc. Fort Mohave Mesa Fire Department will be providing fire protection for this project, and private carrier will be providing the solid waste (garbage) disposal to Mohave Valley Landfill, and WHEREAS, Article 3.10 states, "Upon application to the Commission and prior to the expiration of the time limit, extensions in increments of one (1) year may be granted by the Board if the subdivider is actively processing the Final Plat. If such action is not taken then all proceedings relating to the plat shall be terminated.", and ~'" \0 2 . Address and comply with requirements of the dated March 25, 1991, from Harold Ganyo, Mohave Engineer (Exhibit "A. attached). letter County " . . PAGE BK 2 OF 2351 PG 4 829 (FEE~9+- ~867i RESOLUTION NO. 94-39 page 2 WHEREAS, in a letter dated December 2, 1993, Bryan Holland, Holland West, Inc., states: "Holland West, Inc., for and on behalf of Mr. Roy Davis, would like to respectfully request an Extension of Time on the Preliminary Plat for Mesa Vistas, Tract 4117. "Mr. Davis informed us that he intends to move forward on this project once some internal workings of the partnership are resolved. He also mentioned that the slow economy over the past couple of years which has affected the entire area, has played a part in the temporary delay of the project...., and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Subdivision Plan was approved by the Mohave County Board of Superv'~ors on December 3, 1990, via Resolution No. 90-349. BOS Resolution No. 91-110, dated April 1, 1991, approved the Final Plat which has not yet been recorded. This will serve as the first and second Extensions of Time, and WHEREAS, at the public hearing before the Mohave County Planning Commission on January 12, 1994, the Commission recommended conditional approval of the requested Extension of Time subject to the following: 1. Compliance with all conditions as stated in BOS Resolution No. 90-349. ". .,. ~ .'0<.." 3. This Extension of Time will be in effect until December 3, 1994. WHEREAS, notice of hearing has been met and published throughout this subdivision process as required by Arizona Rev ised Statutes and Mohave County Regulations, and the public was afforded notice of this action through advertisement of the Board of Supervisors meeting for this date. -~ MESA VISTAS, Planning and MOHAVE COUNT! BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~'11 (0. I.i) d}tJ--. -SilIIl- ~aflde-:EfeJ?-r-~.fta.j,~---- Joan C. Ward, Chairman - ~HI6/( !If'; I' . PAGE 3 Of ~ BK 2351 PG 830 (f~E~9+~ 6867) 3675 ANDY DEVINE AVENUE, SUITE C. KINGMAN_ ARIZONA S6401 TELEPHONE 16021757.0910 FAX 1602)757-0912 County Engineer Richard A. Skalicky_ P_E_ H.J. Ganyo. P.E. Director Date: March 25, 1991 Roads M Esquibel Flood Control DisHicl - .'.-..........-.-........ MOHAVE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS From: Harold J. Ganyo, P.E., County Engineer To: Jim Neblett, Planning and Zoning Re: Comment reply letter from Holland West regarding Mesa Vista Subdivision Tr. 4117. Listed below are this Departments comments to HOLLAND WEST, INC. reply letter dated March 14, 1991. \ ': 1. Reply comment number 1 states that the proposed 2' earthen berm along the El Rodeo R\W is no longer necessary per Holland West's revised drainage data. The (copy of output enclosed) has not been received by this Department for our review of this determination. This information needs to be sUbmitted for review to this Department as it is critical to the overall proposed drainage scheme. ;:~, .'::;r ~.,,: 2. Details of the proposed improvements associated with the park in Parcel C need to be reviewed by this Department to determine if these improvements will have any adverse impact on the design or capacity of the drainage channel. 3. Article 3.6-4 (DETAILED DRAINAGE REPORT) of the Mohave County Subdivision Regulations states "An evaluation of the detailed drainage report shall be made by the County Engineer". An evaluation of the method for conveying flows within this development has been made and it is my opinion that if flows are to be carried within the street R/W, these flows must be contained either within the improved paved roadway section or in a ditch section removed from the improved roadway section. The purpose of this is minimize future maintenance to the county. 4. A revised Final Plat showing all revisions and/or additions mentioned in HOlland West reply letter dated March 14, 1991 will need to be submitted for review and approval prior to recordation of the Final Plat. . .,'~ _..~ 5. ArtiCle 3.11-4 requires that the corners of this SUbdivision shall be noted as such. Therefore in addition to the subdivision corner monuments being described, they also need to be labeled as "corner this sUbdivision". This can be done on each boundary corner or by a note in the legend. Building/GrOl,lnd Maintenance Owen A. Shl,lltl: Emergency Sef.....ice$ Ditector Jerry O. Hill Landfill Parks Oepartment TOom 6radv EQuipment/Vehicle MaintenanCE;! C.L.. Key . . . . PAGE 4 OF 4 ~K 2351 PG 831 (FEE~~4- 6867) 6. This Department recommends that the developer be required to provide curb and gutter along the west side of Mountain View Road. The purpose of this is to protect the integrity of this road and adjacent properties from floodwaters. See comment #3 this letter. 7. It appears that parcel A is intended to be a commercial lot. If this is the case then the regulations require that an alley be provided at the rear of this parcel or lots within it per Article 6.4-25. In addition, it is the opinion of this Dept. that the access from the commercial parcel be restricted to two driveway entrances, one on E1 Rodeo Road and one on Mountain View Road , each of which is at least 200 feet from the intersection of these two roads. Reference Article 6.10-17. 8. Sheet 4 of the improvement plans shoW a slope adjacent to Mountain View Road encroaching on lots 1-6 of Block 1. This encroachment should be covered by ~ slope maintenance easement. This would also apply to the northwest corner of parcel A. The purpose for this is to insure the integrity of this slope area and allow for future maintenance by the county whiCh can not be accomplished if an easement does not exist. 9. The detailed seWer and water plans need to be provided to this Dept. for review prior to Final Plat recordation or the beginning of construction. .(t-.:;-:-;' . .:,~~,,;," 10. The final plat submitted does not specify the purpose of the parcels. (Article 3.11-5) Article 6.3-3 requires that "Large drainage channels shall be designated as parcels and dedicated to the public for use as drainage ways." The dedication statement does not. address this requirement. ., '<'~'-' ~. ." :,"';