HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-039
~
.
INOEXEa
~[f5
MiCROfiLMED
I ~)
\~
',,1
~~....- 6867 BK 2351 PG 828
OFFICIAL R~CORDS OF HOHAVE COU~TY AI.
*JCAN NoCALL, MOHAVE ,OUNfY RECOROER*
~2/03/94 2:30 P.r" PAGE 1 OF 4
MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
HECORDING FEE 0.00 Ne
.'~-.
""~~"
"~. "
/
.~:_...~.....
RESOLUTION NO. 94-39
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH APPROVAL OF AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR MESA VISTAS, TRACT 4117, BEING
THE W~ OF THE SW~, SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 22 WP.ST,
LOCATED IN THE SOUTH MOHAVE VALLEY AREA, MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA.
WHEREAS, at the regular meet; Tlg of the Mohave County Board
of Supervisors held on February 1, 1994, a public hearing waS
conducted to determine the approval of an Extension of Time for
the approved Preliminary Plan of MESA VISTAS, Tract 4117, and
.'
:.,.,..,
WHEREAS, the owner and subdivider is Black Mountain
Development of Bullhead City, Arizona. The engineer responsible
for the preparation of the Drainage Report and design of this
subdivision is Holland West, Inc., Denver, Colorado, and Bullhead
City, Arizona, and
\.. "";'.::'
WHEREAS, this subdivision is located one mile east of
Highway 95 and is between Camp Mohave Road and El Rodeo Road with
El Rodeo Road as the primary access, and
WHEREAS, the Preliminary Plan depicts approximately 42 acres
subdiv ided into 14 7 6, OOO-square- foot Single Family Residential
lots and a four-acre Commercial lot, and
WHEREAS, the water will be supplied by Bermuda Water
Company, electric power by Mohave Electric Cooperative, and
telephone service by Citizens Utilities Company. Sewage disposal
is proposed by package treatment plant or hookup to Sorenson
Utility Company, Inc. Fort Mohave Mesa Fire Department will be
providing fire protection for this project, and private carrier
will be providing the solid waste (garbage) disposal to Mohave
Valley Landfill, and
WHEREAS, Article 3.10 states, "Upon application to the
Commission and prior to the expiration of the time limit,
extensions in increments of one (1) year may be granted by the
Board if the subdivider is actively processing the Final Plat.
If such action is not taken then all proceedings relating to the
plat shall be terminated.", and
~'" \0
2 .
Address and comply with requirements of the
dated March 25, 1991, from Harold Ganyo, Mohave
Engineer (Exhibit "A. attached).
letter
County
"
.
.
PAGE
BK
2 OF
2351 PG
4
829 (FEE~9+- ~867i
RESOLUTION NO. 94-39
page 2
WHEREAS, in a letter dated December 2, 1993, Bryan Holland,
Holland West, Inc., states:
"Holland West, Inc., for and on behalf of Mr. Roy Davis,
would like to respectfully request an Extension of Time on the
Preliminary Plat for Mesa Vistas, Tract 4117.
"Mr. Davis informed us that he intends to move forward on
this project once some internal workings of the partnership are
resolved. He also mentioned that the slow economy over the past
couple of years which has affected the entire area, has played a
part in the temporary delay of the project...., and
WHEREAS, the Preliminary Subdivision Plan was approved by
the Mohave County Board of Superv'~ors on December 3, 1990, via
Resolution No. 90-349. BOS Resolution No. 91-110, dated April 1,
1991, approved the Final Plat which has not yet been recorded.
This will serve as the first and second Extensions of Time, and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing before the Mohave County
Planning Commission on January 12, 1994, the Commission
recommended conditional approval of the requested Extension of
Time subject to the following:
1.
Compliance with all conditions as stated in BOS
Resolution No. 90-349.
". .,. ~
.'0<.."
3. This Extension of Time will be in effect until December
3, 1994.
WHEREAS, notice of hearing has been met and published
throughout this subdivision process as required by Arizona
Rev ised Statutes and Mohave County Regulations, and the public
was afforded notice of this action through advertisement of the
Board of Supervisors meeting for this date.
-~
MESA VISTAS,
Planning and
MOHAVE COUNT! BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~'11 (0. I.i) d}tJ--.
-SilIIl- ~aflde-:EfeJ?-r-~.fta.j,~----
Joan C. Ward, Chairman
-
~HI6/(
!If';
I'
.
PAGE 3 Of ~
BK 2351 PG 830 (f~E~9+~ 6867)
3675 ANDY DEVINE AVENUE, SUITE C. KINGMAN_ ARIZONA S6401
TELEPHONE 16021757.0910 FAX 1602)757-0912
County Engineer Richard A. Skalicky_ P_E_
H.J. Ganyo. P.E. Director
Date: March 25, 1991
Roads
M Esquibel
Flood Control
DisHicl
- .'.-..........-.-........
MOHAVE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
From:
Harold J. Ganyo, P.E., County Engineer
To:
Jim Neblett, Planning and Zoning
Re:
Comment reply letter from Holland West regarding Mesa
Vista Subdivision Tr. 4117.
Listed below are this Departments comments to HOLLAND WEST, INC.
reply letter dated March 14, 1991.
\ ':
1. Reply comment number 1 states that the proposed 2' earthen berm
along the El Rodeo R\W is no longer necessary per Holland West's
revised drainage data. The (copy of output enclosed) has not been
received by this Department for our review of this determination.
This information needs to be sUbmitted for review to this
Department as it is critical to the overall proposed drainage
scheme.
;:~,
.'::;r ~.,,:
2. Details of the proposed improvements associated with the park
in Parcel C need to be reviewed by this Department to determine if
these improvements will have any adverse impact on the design or
capacity of the drainage channel.
3. Article 3.6-4 (DETAILED DRAINAGE REPORT) of the Mohave
County Subdivision Regulations states "An evaluation of the
detailed drainage report shall be made by the County Engineer". An
evaluation of the method for conveying flows within this
development has been made and it is my opinion that if flows are to
be carried within the street R/W, these flows must be contained
either within the improved paved roadway section or in a ditch
section removed from the improved roadway section. The purpose of
this is minimize future maintenance to the county.
4. A revised Final Plat showing all revisions and/or additions
mentioned in HOlland West reply letter dated March 14, 1991 will
need to be submitted for review and approval prior to recordation
of the Final Plat.
. .,'~
_..~
5. ArtiCle 3.11-4 requires that the corners of this SUbdivision
shall be noted as such. Therefore in addition to the subdivision
corner monuments being described, they also need to be labeled as
"corner this sUbdivision". This can be done on each boundary
corner or by a note in the legend.
Building/GrOl,lnd
Maintenance
Owen A. Shl,lltl:
Emergency Sef.....ice$
Ditector
Jerry O. Hill
Landfill
Parks Oepartment
TOom 6radv
EQuipment/Vehicle
MaintenanCE;!
C.L.. Key
.
.
.
.
PAGE 4 OF 4
~K 2351 PG 831 (FEE~~4- 6867)
6. This Department recommends that the developer be required to
provide curb and gutter along the west side of Mountain View Road.
The purpose of this is to protect the integrity of this road and
adjacent properties from floodwaters. See comment #3 this letter.
7. It appears that parcel A is intended to be a commercial lot.
If this is the case then the regulations require that an alley be
provided at the rear of this parcel or lots within it per Article
6.4-25. In addition, it is the opinion of this Dept. that the
access from the commercial parcel be restricted to two driveway
entrances, one on E1 Rodeo Road and one on Mountain View Road ,
each of which is at least 200 feet from the intersection of these
two roads. Reference Article 6.10-17.
8. Sheet 4 of the improvement plans shoW a slope adjacent to
Mountain View Road encroaching on lots 1-6 of Block 1. This
encroachment should be covered by ~ slope maintenance easement.
This would also apply to the northwest corner of parcel A. The
purpose for this is to insure the integrity of this slope area and
allow for future maintenance by the county whiCh can not be
accomplished if an easement does not exist.
9. The detailed seWer and water plans need to be provided to this
Dept. for review prior to Final Plat recordation or the beginning
of construction.
.(t-.:;-:-;'
. .:,~~,,;,"
10. The final plat submitted does not specify the purpose of the
parcels. (Article 3.11-5) Article 6.3-3 requires that "Large
drainage channels shall be designated as parcels and dedicated to
the public for use as drainage ways." The dedication statement
does not. address this requirement.
., '<'~'-'
~. ." :,"';