Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-011 ~s , /:,"'7> ! ' "';. ,<.~~~:.v .":,,.,.. t",c>,,^ 'L'L.;~" ~"'~'" j;.;/~"! -;'.,""'~. ~ ."'1' " .' . . 7 #2 lllCROFlLMm TNUtXED :;''94- 1462 BY. 2337 PG :1139 OFFICIAL RECOROS OF MOHAVE COUNTY AI. ~JOAH McCALL. MUHAVE COUNTY RECORDER- 01/1019.. IlIOO A,l'l. PAGE 1 OF J l'lOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RECQROIWG FEE O.no He 00 ~A~ ~lD,~~ IDl MOHAVE COUNTY PlANNING &lONING COMM. OY........................................................._ RESOLUTION NO. 94-11 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH A REZONE OF THE SE\ OF THE NE\ OF PARCEL 60, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 18 WEST, FROM A-R (AGRICULTURAL-RESIDENTIAL) ZONE TO C-2 (GENERAL-COMMERCIAL) ZONE, LOCATED IN THE GOLDEN VALLEY AREA, MORAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA. WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors held on January 3, 1994, a public hearing was conducted to determine whether approval should be granted for a rezone for the above described property to owner Betty Deason of Golden Valley, Arizona, and WHEREAS, the property is located approximately one mile south of Highway 68 and west of Colorado Road. The property is accessed from Highway 68 via Colorado Road, then south to the property, and WHEREAS, the area surrounding the property is primarily vacant with residential homes to the east and west, and WHEREAS, the property is within the boundaries of the Valley Pioneer Water Company. Colorado Road, which provides access to the property, is gravel, and WHEREAS, the property is being used for the storage of hay and other miscellaneous items. There are two large covered steel structures with open sides where the hay is stored. There is also a storage building and numerous trucks, trailers, equipment and other assorted items including tires, appliances and storage barrels. The area is enclosed by a chain link fence, and WHEREAS, review of Floodplain Map #040058-2325B indicates this parcel to be in Zone C, an area of minimal flooding, and WHEREAS, the owner of the property is in violation of the Mohave County Zoning regulations due to the nature of operations taking place on the parcel, and WHEREAS, this parcel is located within the GOlden Valley Area Plan boundary. The plan designates this area as Low Density Residential. No area plan amendment has been completed to permit the proposed commercial change, and ~ "'.: .": . .: ':,.', '~':+~ .~,(j;;o/' f.r.:.~ ':";j A".,',,~iJ~. t~'<'1'~. ,-,i.... t. :""..I.~;;. '-:...;..i" . '.' . . RESOLUTION NO. 94-11 Page 2 PAGE 2 OF :3 5K 2339 PG 290 (FEE~94- 1462) WHEREAS, the Golden Valley/Sacramento Valley Area Plan was adopted per P&ZC Resolution No. 80-62, The area plan lists a number of proposals that indicates the problem/situation, lists the .goals and identifies the objective/solution. Proposal H deals with commercial properties. The plan indicates that "In an effort to meet future demands, it is recommended th(it cluster commercial districts be encouraged as opposed to strip zoning along Highway 68 and 93. This would help protect the integrity of the highway function, that of carrying traffic through the area." The plan specifically lists the areas which may be considered for commercial zoning Classifications, The subj ect property is NOT one of the properties listed in the plan, and WHEREAS, in 1987 an amendment to the Golden Valley/Sacramento Valley Area Plan regarding the areas which may be considered for commercial zoning classifications was approved per P&ZC Resolution No. 87-26. The plan specifically listed properties along Highway 68 identified for consideration for commercial zoning that were not identified in the 1980 plan. The parcels identified in the plan are subject to the submittal of a development plan for a specific commercial use or activity, together with a formal rezOne application, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning staff uses Area Plans as guides to help direct growth and development in the County. Zone changes without amending the area plan limits the ability of staff to properly plan the future needs of the County, limits community input and concerns, and overrides policies approved by the Planning (ind Zoning Commission and the Board of Supervisors, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning staff recommended denial for this rezone based on the following: (1) The area plan indicates this area to be A-R (Agricultural-Residential), (ind the plan has not been amended; and (2) this change would set a precedent that would encourage changes without amending area plans, unplanned l(ind use changes without proper analyses, and continue commercial strip zoning, and WHEREAS, at the public hearing Planning and Zoning Commission on Commission recommended APPROVAL for following: before the Mohave County December 8, 1993, the a rezone subject to the 1. The parcel be zoned C-2/2A (General CommerCial/Two Acre Minimum Lot Size). 2. That appropriate zoning, building, environmental and floodplain permits be obtained, where necessary. , RESOLUTION NO. 94-11 Page 3 . . . ~ , """,-,~ I \. c!....~,../ PAGE J OF J SK 2339 PG 291 (FEE~94- 1462) 3. The applicant comply with all applicable provisions of the Mohave County Zoning Regulations. 4. The rezone shall not become effective until 30 days after final approval of the change in classification by the Board of Supervisors, as per ARS ll-829E. WHEREAS, the notice of hearing was published in the Kingman Daily Miner, a newspaper of general circulation in Kingman, Mohave County, Arizona, December 19, 1993, and posted December 17, 1993, as required by Arizona Revised Statutes and the Mohave County Zoning Regulations. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors, at their regular meeting on Monday, January 3, 1994, APPROVED this rezone as recommended by the Mohave County Planning and Zoning Commission and outlined herein. ATTEST: ":;l ~F SUF~nsORS Sam an r er, Chairman , ',.:,,:'; ~ , ,T',", r". "'.':,,!;, /,5,',",4, ~~'.;',;.\;;