Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-251 ~~ ~ . . 1#2 5 TN'OEXEQ -=-'94- ....6978 BK 2~4~ PG <;'9; uffICIAl RECORDS OF HOHAVE COUNTY AI. *JOAN HpCALL. MOHAVE COUHTY RECORDER- 08/09/94 J'30 P.F.. PAGE 1 OF 3 MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RECOROIHG FEE 0.00 He -MlC1l0FlLMEO RESOLUTION NO. 94-251 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH RESCISSION OF BOS RESOLUTION NO. 89- 107. A RESOLUTION WHICH REZONED AN APPROXIMATELY 17-ACRE PARCEL TO BE KNOWN AND SUBDIVIDED AS PEPPERMILL PALMS GOLF VILLAS, TRACT 3025. FROM C-RE/36A (COMMERCIAL RECREATION/THIRTY-SIX ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE), TO SD/R (SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT/RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, BEING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 16 WEST, LOCATED IN THE ARIZONA STRIP AREA, MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA. WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors held August 8, 1994, a public hearing was conducted to determine whether BOS Resolution No. 89~107 should be rescinded, and WHEREAS, this resolution established the zoning for an approximately 17-acre parcel to be known and subdivided as Peppermill Palms Golf Villas, Tract 3025. The resolution was approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 4, 1989, and WHEREAS, this subdivision is located approximately one-half mile south of Interstate 15 off of Highway 91, two miles east of Mesquite, Nevada. The primary access to this mult-family subdivision and public golf course is intended to be from Highway 91 to Peppermill Palms Boulevard, and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Plan depicts a 17-acre parcel containing 14 four-unit structures which comprise a total of 56 time share condominimum units, and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 89-106 approved the Preliminary Plan for Pcppcrmill Ps.lm~ Golf Villas, Tract 3025, on December 4, 1989. There has been one Extension of Time that was granted via BOS Resolution NO. 92-2 on January 6, 1992, and WHEREAS, on September 24, 1992, and March 26, 1993, letters were sent by staff to John R. Stanton, representative of Peppermill Palms Golf Resort, advising him that an Extension of Time was necessary and that the following two options were available to him: (1) submit an application for an Extension of Time prior to December 4, 1992, or (2) let the subdivision terminate and file a new set of Sketch Plans at a later date, and . . . RESOLUTION NO. 94-251 Page 2 PAGE :2 OF J BK 24~5 PG 991 (rEE~~4-4b97S) WHEREAS, a reply to the letters was received from LeAnn Potter, Executive Director of Administration, Peppermil1 Resort Hotel and Casino on April 29, 1993. This letter advised that the corporation did not feel it was necessary to file for an Extension of Time for the project. The letter further advised that they were working on the Master Plan for the Arizona properties, and that the County would be notified when the project status was finalized, and WHEREAS, letters were sent by staff on May 21 and August 26, 1993, to LeAnn potter further advising her that failure to submit the application for the Extension of Time and accompanying fees would invalidate the previously granted approvals for the subdivision" which would terminate the project. There was no reponse to the letters, and WHEREAS, staff spoke with John R. Stanton on April 8, 1994, via telephone. Mr. Stanton advised that the Peppermill Resort is no longer interested in pursuing the proj ect. He asked that a letter be sent to Rhett Long, the developer, to veri fy this information prior to action being taken by the County to rescind the project's approvals, and WHEREAS, a letter was sent by staff on April 8, 1994, to Rhett Long, addressed to the Peppermill Resort and Casino. This letter referred to courtesy letters that had been sent by staff advising of the requirements for an Extension of Time. The letter also recounted the conversation with John R. Stanton and his statement that the project was no longer being pursued. The letter requested an update on the status of the project and asked that the required fees be submitted if the project was going to be completed. The letter further advised that if the fees and request letter were not received by May 8, 1994, staff intended to recommend rescission of approval for the Preliminary Plan to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. There was no reply to this letter, and WHEREAS, on May 13, 1994, a letter was sent by staff to Rhett Long, addressed to the Pe'ppermill Resort and Casino, via Certified Mail (see attached letters). This letter advised that since no reply had been received to prior letters, two matters relating to the rescinsion of the approved Preliminary Plan for Peppermill Palms Golf Villas, Tract 3025, would be heard by the Mohave Planning and Zoning Commission on July 13, 1994. The resolutions whiCh would be rescinded are BOS 89-106 (Preliminary Plan approval), and BOS 89-107 (zoning resolution) which rezoned the parcel from C-RE/36A (Commercial-Recreational/Thirty-six Acre Minimum Lot Size) to SD/R (Special Development/Residential), and . . . RESOLUTION NO. 94-251 Page 3 PAGE 3 Of 3 BK 2~45 PG 992 CfEE:94-46978) WHEREAS, a letter was received from LeAnn Potter, Executive Director of Administration, Peppermill Resort and Casino, on May 26, 1994, advising the Planning and Zoning Commission of their intentions to rescind the resolution which granted Preliminary Plan approval for their project. Ms. Potter advised that it was management t s understanding that if they decided at some later date to pursue the project, they would be required to reprocess the project beginning at the Sketch Plan stage, and WHEREAS, at a public hearing On July 13, 1994, the Mohave County Planning and Zoning Commission recommended RESCISSION of BOS Resolution No. 89-107, and WHEREAS, the notice of hearing was published in the Kingman Daily Miner, a newspaper of general circulation, in Kingman, Mohave County, Arizona on July 24, 1994, as required by the Arizona Revised Statutes and the Mohave County Zoning Regulations. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors, at their regular meeting on Monday, August 8, 1994, RESCINDED BOS Resolution No. 89-107 and reverted the zoning classification from SD/R (Special Development/Residential) to CRE/36A (Commercial Recreation/Thirty-six Acre Minimum Lot Size), as recommended by the Mohave County Planning and Zoning Commission. Attest: Mohave County Board of Supervisors ~~wa;d, ~~~man ~