The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About95-003 'l-V 'O? o BEING RE RECORDED INCLUDE EXHIBIT A , ~~;~> ~i ,. . - .~. ,- ,..-... /r........,.;;.: .~.--- "<.ti\ I>~j"' . ,"'\ .f:I<,' ," ,\-j ",,' , , 'J~~;f0): ' ~ MK'JI()FlLMED 4 TNOEXEQ '-\'io9'5-- 371 E.Y. 2510 FG 4\ OFFIClAl RECORDS OF MOHAVE. (:QUMTY (,7. ~JOAN McCALL. MOHAVE COUNTY RECORDER' ul/0~i9~ 1:30 P.~, PAGE 1 OF 2 MORAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RECQROIN~ FEE 0.00 NG RESOLUTION NO. 95-3 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN FOR MESA VISTAS, TRACT 4117, BEING THE W 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4, SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST, LOCATED IN THE SOUTH MOHA VE V ALLEY AREA, MORAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA. WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors held on January 3, 1995, a public hearing was conducted to determine whether approval should be granted for an Extension of Time for the above described property to Ray and Margaret Davis of Fullerton, California. The engineer responsible for the preparation of the Drainage Report and design of this subdivision is Holland West, Inc., Denver, Colorado and Bullhead City, Arizona, and WHEREAS, this subdivision is located one mile east of Highway 95 and is between Camp Mohave Road and EI Rodeo Road. EI Rodeo Road is the primary access for the subdivision, and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Plan depicts approximately 42 acres subdivided into 147 6,OOO-square foot Single Family Residential lots and a four-acre commercial lot, and WHEREAS, according to the developer, water will be supplied by Bermuda Water Company, electric power by Mohave Electric Cooperative, and telephone service by Citizens Utilities Company. Sewage disposal is proposed by package treatment plant or hook-up to Sorenson Utility Company, Inc. Fort Mojave Mesa Fire Department will be providing fire protection for this project, and a private carrier will be collecting and transporting solid waste to the Mohave Valley Landfill, and WHEREAS, Article 3.10 states, "Upon application to the Commission and prior to the expiration of the time limit, extensions in increments of one (I) year may be granted by the Board if the subdivider is actively processing the Final Plat. If such action is not taken then all proceedings relating to the plat shall be terminated.", and WHEREAS, in a letter dated October 24,1994, Brenner Holland, Holland West, Inc., on behalf of the subdivider, cites depressed economy and perceived lot saturation in the area as justification for the Extension of Time. He states further that the developer is actively addressing the conditions attached to the Resolution which approved the Final plat for this project. Recordatiorzof the Plat and construction of the subdivision is expected in 1995, and ~ " iNDEXED I .95- 21887 BK 2559?G 95( ~i OFFICIAl RECORDS OF MOHAVE COUWTY AZ. r ~JOAN H~CALL, MOHAVE COUNTY RECORDER* u~/28/9~ 1:~~ P.fi, PAGE ! OF 4 nOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RECORDING FEE 0.00 Ne , \fCRDFlLMEO ~ ... . . RESOLUTION NO. 95-3 Page 2 P~GE 2 OF flll 2~10 PG ~ ~ 443 (FEEt?!.i- 371> WHEREAS, the Preliminary Subdivision Plan was approved by the Mohave County Board of Supervisors on December 3,1990, via Resolution No. 90-349. BaS Resolution No. 91-110, dated April J, 1991, approved the Final Plat which has not yet been recorded. BaS Resolution No. 94-39 granted the first and second extensions. This will be the third Extension of Time, and WHEREAS, at the public hearing before the Mohave County Planning and Zoning Commission on December 14, 1994, the Commission recommended APPROVAL for an Extension of Time subject to the following: I. Compliance with all conditions as stated in BaS Resolution Nos. 90-349 and 9 I -II O. 2. Address and comply with requirements of the letter dated March 25, 1991, from Harold Ganyo, Mohave County Engineer (Exhibit "A" attached). 3. Submittal of revised or recertification of cost estimate to be approved by the County Engineer. 4. This Extension of Time will be in effect until December 3, 1995. WHEREAS, the notice of hearing was published in the Kingman Daily Miner, a newspaper of general circulation in Kingman, Mohave County, Arizona, December 18, 1994, and posted December 19, 1994, as required by Arizona Revised Statutes and the Mohave County Zoning Regulations. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors, at their regular meeting on Tuesday, January 3, 1995, APPROVED this Extension of Time as recommended by the Mohave County Planning as Zoning Commission and outlined herein. MOHA VE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ATTEST: ~A'\ e ( WIlU loa C. Ward, ChaIrman /./;/2;/ // . t Wuil?tld. UYttlC!Y'A ' -<.- Pat Chastain, Clerk (/ P~GE 2 OF ~ BK 2~~9 PG 951 (FEE~95-21g87) ~ .XI-IIB/T R . 3675 ANDY DEVINE AVENUE. SUITE C. KINGMAN. ARIZONA 86401 TELEPHONE (602) 757.0910 FAX 16021757.0912 MOHAVE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS ~...~.,,_..~.._.~ --'. ---.- ~--._-_..._-_.._--- County Engineer Richard A. Skalicky, P.E. H.J. Ganyo, P.E. Director Date: March 25, 1991 Roads M. Esquibel Flood Control Olstrlcl From: Harold J. Ganyo, P.E., County Engineer To: Jim Neblett, Planning and Zoning Comment reply letter from Holland West regarding Mesa vista Subdivision Tr. 4117. Re: Listed below are this Departments comments to HOLLAND WEST, INC. reply letter dated March 14, 1991. 1. Reply comment number 1 states that the proposed 2' earthen berm along the El Rodeo R\W is no longer necessary per Holland West's revised drainage data. The (copy of output enclosed) has not been received by this Department for our review of this determination. This information needs to be submitted for review to this Department as it is critical to the overall proposed drainage scheme. 2. Details of the proposed improvements associated with the park in Parcel C need to be reviewed by this Department to determine if these improvements will have any adverse impact on the design or capacity of the drainage channel. 3. Article 3.6-4 (DETAILED DRAINAGE REPORT) of the Mohave County Subdivision Regulations states "An evaluation of the detailed drainage report shall be made by the County Engineer". An evaluation of the method for conveying flows within this development has been made and it is my opinion that if flows are to be carried within the street R/W, these flows must be contained either within the improved paved roadway section or in a ditch section removed from the improved roadway section. The purpose of this is minimize future maintenance to the county. 4. A revised Final Plat showing all revisions and/or additions mentioned in Holland West reply letter dated March 14, 1991 will need to be submitted for review and approval prior to recordation of the Final Plat. 5. Article 3.11-4 requires that the corners of this subdivision shall be noted as such. Therefore in addition to the subdivision corner monuments being described, they also need to be labeled as "corner this subdivision". This can be done on each boundary corner or by a note in the legend. PAliE ;; 01' 4 BK 2559 PG 95Z <FrE~95-Z1887l Building/Ground Maintenance Owen R. Shultz Emergency Services Director Jerry D. Hill Landfill Parks Deparlment Tom Brady EquipmenUVehlcle Maintenance C.L Key .. . . 6. This Department recommends that the developer be required to provide curb and gutter along the west side of Mountain View Road. The purpose of this is to protect the integrity of this road and adjacent properties from floodwaters. See comment #3 this letter. 7. It appears that parcel A is intended to be a commercial lot. If this is the case then the regulations require that an alley be provided at the rear of this parcel or lots within it per Article 6.4-25. In addition, it is the opinion of this Dept. that the access from the commercial parcel be restricted to two driveway entrances, one on El Rodeo Road and one on Mountain View Road , each of which is at least 200 feet from the intersection of these two roads. Reference Article 6.10-17. 8. Sheet 4 of the improvement plans show a slope adjacent to Mountain view Road encroaching on lots 1-6 of Block 1. This encroachment should be covered by a slope maintenance easement. This would also apply to the northwest corner of parcel A. The purpose for this is to insure the integrity of this slope area and allow for future maintenance by the county which can not be accomplished if an easement does not exist. 9. The detailed sewer and water plans need to be provided to this Dept. for review prior to Final Plat recordation or the beginning of construction. 10. The final plat submitted does not specify the purpose of the parcels. (Article 3.11-5) Article 6.3-3 requires that "Large drainage channels shall be designated as parcels and dedicated to the public for use as drainage ways." The dedication statement does not address this requirement. =.:::-, "'-..... #./-,~~'''''.'., r:.i'r&^ " ~,J~---~I"7.'" "/.,"--Y-<\~~t~ '~"~ f.,"~:;.-;....r,,\1 .......... ~ .,. ". f;/.'~ -/.~.\.\" . , , i;:"';,t-'- , 460~i '(. ~L {~:=;' .. ,'.' f~:,,::1 ',-l,A,Rot' . , \~\ \~WlftfJ;!i !';A' ,....:=.Sln,.d.~,.. ,,- ::. _ ':l' .-.,~r,!/n~jI,\ lJ. .....~.:L~.:..: PAGE " OF 4 BK 2559 PG 953 (FEE~95-2188?)