HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-246 INDEXED
980..¢1¢69 BK 31,.2 P6 807
OF'F[C[~L RECgRDS OF HOH~gE COUNTY~ ~Z
JO~ ~(: (:~LL~ HOH~VE COUNTY RECORDER
07/1~198 02:[9P P~GE t OF 2
MOHAVE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
RECORDING FEE
RESOLUTION NO. 98-246
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH A RESCISSION OF BOS RESOLUTION NOS. 90-119, 90-120,
90-280, 90-324, AND 91-198, WHICH CONDITIONALLY APPROVED THE PRELIMINARY
PLAN, REZONING, SEPARATE PETITIONS OF EXCEPTION, AND AN ABANDONMENT OF
ROADWAYS FOR THE UNRECORDED PORTION OF SHIPP ESTATES III, TRACT 3026,
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE S% OF PARCEL 13, PARCEL 14, AND THE S½ OF THE S¼
OF PARCEL 15, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY, BOOK 1, PAGE 35, IN SECTION 12,
TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 19 WEST, IN THE GOLDEN VALLEY AREA, MOHAVE
COUNTY, ARIZONA.
WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors held on July 13,
1998, a public hearing was conducted to determine whether the approvals for the above-described project
should be rescinded. The owner/developer is Judith Chen Haggerty, City of Industry, California. The
project engineer of record is Mohave Engineering Associates, Inc., Kingman, Arizona, and
WHEREAS, the property is located approximately 9 miles west of the City of Kingman and is
accessed via State Highway 68, then south along and west of Teddy Roosevelt Road, and
WHEREAS, the Preliminary Plan depicts 90 acres subdivided into 280 single-family residential lots,
and
WHEREAS, the Preliminary Plan for Shipp Estates III, Tract 3026, was approved by the Mohave
County Board of Supervisors on May 7, 1990, per BOS Resolution No. 90-I 19. The rezoning of the
property was conditionally approved on the same date, per BOS Resolution No. 90-120. A separate Petition
of Exception was approved on October 1, 1990, per BOS Resolution No. 90-280. A portion o£ Shipp Drive
was abandoned as a part of the platting of this subdivision, and approved on November 5, 1990, per BOS
Resolution No. 90-324. Another separate Petition of Exception was approved July 22, 1991, per BOS
Resolution No. 91-198. The first and second Extensions of Time for the approval of the Preliminary Plan
were granted on September 7, 1993, per BOS Resolution No. 93-255. The third extension was granted on
September 6, 1994, per BOS Resolution No. 94-298. The fourth extension was granted on August 7, 1995,
per BOS Resolution No. 95-322. The fifth extension was granted on June 3, 1996, per BOS Resolution No.
96-189. The sixth extension was granted on June 2, 1997, per BOS Resolution No. 97-179, expiring
automatically on April 2, 1998, and
WHEREAS, the Final Plat for the first phase of this development, Tract 3026-A, was approved on
December 17, 1990, per BOS Resolution No. 90-381, and was recorded on October 1, 1991, and
PAGE 2 OF 2
BK 3122 PG 808 FEE~98041469
RESOLUTION NO. 98-246 Page 2
WHEREAS, the subdivision has not been processed since the recordation of the Final Plat for Phase
A in 1991. One of the conditions of the last Extension of Time required the developer to have the project
engineer submit for processing the Final Plat for Phase B of this subdivision. No Final Plat has ever been
submitted for Phase B. No as-built improvement plans have been submitted for Phase B to demonstxate that
m~y work has been completed in Phase B. The project engineer recently confirmed that the Final Plat for
Phase B (seven lots) had been prepared nearly two years ago, but that the developer has not submitted the
review fees necessary to make the submittal to the County for review, and had further not expressed an
interest in moving the subdivision forward. The developer did not request an Extension of Time for the
approval of the project, and
WHEREAS, all resolutions, including BOS Resolution Nos. 93-255, 94-298, 95-322, 96-189 amd
97-179, which require compliance with the conditions of the above-referenced rescinded approvals, are
themselves voided. This rescission affects only the unrecorded portion of Tract 3026, and
WHEREAS, all notices have been advertised and posted according to regulations, and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing before the Mohave County Planning and Zoning Commission on
June i0, 1998, the Commission recommended APPROVAL of the rescission of this subdivision, and
WHEREAS, the notice of hearing was published in The Standard, a newspaper of general
circulation in Kingman, Mohave County, Arizona, June 27, 1998, and posted on June 26, 1998, as required
by Arizona Revised Statutes and the Mohave County Zoning Regulations.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors, at their regular meeting
on Monday, July 13, 1998, APPROVED the rescission of this subdivision as recommended by the Mohave
County Planning and Zoning Commission and outlined herein.
ATTEST: MO~iERVISORS