Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/06/2009 Item 076 MOHAVE COUNTY REOUEST FOR BOARD ACTION FORM
From: Steven P. Latoski, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director FORMAL ACTION ❑
��''�iC, CONSENT 0
Date: June 25, 2009 RESOLUTION ❑
OTHER ❑
BOS Meeting Date: July 6, 2009 INFORMATION ONLY ❑
SUMMARIZE THE ISSUE & DESIRED ACTION CLEARLY/ATTACH BACKUP
MATERIAL:
At their March 2, 2009 meeting, the Mohave County Board of Supervisors moved to acknowledge
MCC's termination of the lease and authorize staff to move forward relocating the County's facility. At
their March 16, 2009 meeting, the Board directed staff to find another location in Colorado City for the
State/County/Federal facility prior to the expiration of the county's lease with MCC. At their May 18,
2009 meeting, the Board directed staff to review property APN 404-19-092 in the Colorado City area and
all alternatives for the Mohave County Sheriff's Office and County Attorney's Office as well as Mohave
County Courts. Staff has narrowed its search to 4 candidate sites, including 2 sites within property APN
404-19-092 near Colorado City coupled with properties near Fredonia and Scenic. Information on
development considerations and water availability, quality, and accessibility are included in the
accompanying packets.
Recommended Motion:
Identify the desired property for establishing a government facility in the Co(orado City area of Mohave
County, and direct staff to pursue obtaining the property for its intended use.
Reviewed and Approved By:
County Attorney ❑ Personnel ❑ Finance ❑ County Man er
Board Action Taken:
Approved as Requested ❑ No Action Taken ❑ Disapproved ❑
Continued to ❑ Approved with the following changes:
�.�� C�o..C�..� `r`C� l�
Acknowledged receipt and referred to
Filing Information and Retrieval
Filed Bid Filed Agreement �`�� S
BOS Resolution Filed Yearly Correspondence
Filed Petition Filed Dedication
Filed Land Sold Filed Land Acquired
Filed Franchise I.D. Resolution
Filed Improvement District Filed Other
Date Routed: �� C � w ,� Additional lnformation:
XC: `(Y\a���, � C!�.",,,7�.
You are reminded that items for the agenda, along with complete backup, must be in the County
Manager's Office 10 days prior to Board Meeting.
Item No.
REVIEW AND COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS FOR ARIZONA STRIP PROPERTIES
ADAIR NORTH PROPERTY ADAIR PROPERTY BLACK PROPERTY
APN: 404-19-092
APN: 404-19-092
APN: 402-17-063 BUTTON PROPERTY
ELEMENT
COLORADO CITY AREA
COLORADO CITY AREA
SCENIC AREA APN: 405.41-008
-
(Hwy. 389, approx. %-mile north of
(Intersection of Hwy. 389 at Cane Beds
(Scenic Blvd. - approx. 2 miles FREDON
AREA
AREA
Cane Beds Road) Road) south of Hwy. 91) (Hwy.
Land Method Owner lease (3-5 acres. available) , Owner lease (3-5 acres available) Donation (1.5 acres available) _ Purchase (1-2 acres available)
Acquisition Cost $0 $0 $0 $23,0001acre
? Existing AR-1 Zone permits public ? Existing AR-1 Zone permits public ? Existing zoning is R-E/10A ? Existing zoning is R-E/10A
Zoning Method building uses building uses ? Rezone required ? Rezone required
Ordinance ? Site plan required ? Site plan required ? Site plan required ? Site plan required
Compliance Cost Site plan preparation Site plan preparation No application fees No application fees
Site plan preparation Site plan preparation
Access via Hwy. 389 Access via Cane Beds Road " Access via Scenic Blvd. Access via Hwy. 389
(1) Construct ADOT standard driveway - (1) Construct (pave) Cane Beds Road' ` Construct County standard driveway - Construct ADOT standard driveway
Method SO only or (2) construct ADOT standard approach to Hwy. 389 - SO only or (2) Courts and Hwy. 389 right-turn deceleration
driveway and Hwy. 389 left-turn construct (pave) Cane Beds Rd. approach lane - Courts
Site Access deceleration lane - SO and Courts to Hwy. 389 and construct Hwy. 389 right-
turn deceleration lane - SO and Courts
Method 1 = $19,000 Method 1 = $19,000* $9,000 $74,000
Cost Method 2 = $74,000 Method 2 =$74,000`
*Cane Beds Road paving and asphalt
driveway esfimated at additional $66,000
Method Drill well and install Point of Use Drill well and install Point of Use treatment Drill well Drill well and install Point of Use
Water treatment system system treatment system
Cost $28,600 - $33,600 (10 employees) $28,600 - $33,600 (10 employees) $22,600 - $27,600 $28,600 - $33,600 (10 employees)
$34,600 - $39,600 (20 employees) $34,600 - $39,600 (20 employees) $34,600 - $39,600 (20 employees)
FiberlT-1 copper available. South Fiber/T-1 copper available. South Central Fiber and copper available at the SE Fiber/T-1 copper available. South
Central Communications confirmed Communications confirmed connection corner of parcel. Probable Central Communications confirmed
Data* Method connection availability satisfying all types availability satisfying all types of County IT accommodation of all types of County connection availability satisfying all
of County IT and Court IT requirements and Court IT requirements IT and Court IT requirements subject to types of County IT and Court IT
Reliance Connects confirmation. requirements
Cost $12,000-$23,000 $12;000423;000 Undetermined $6,000-$7,500
Method Three phase & single phase overhead Three phase & single phase overhead Three phase & single phase overhead Overhead electric owned by Garkane
Power electric w/ Garkane as the provider electric w/ Garkane as the provider electric w/ Dixie Escalante as provider w/ the City of Fredonia as provider
Cost Approximately $5,000 to $20,000 Approximately $5,000 to $20,000 Approximately $60/KVA Assume same as Adair properties
Phone Method Fiber/T-1 copper available Fiber/T-1 copper available fiber & copper available at SE comer Fiber/T-1 copper available
Cost See Data See Data See Data See Data
$64,600 - $95,600 (SO only) $64,600 - $95,600 (SO only) $50,000 - $60,000 $149,100 - $167,100
Total Probable Cost $125,600 - $156,600 (SO and Courts) $125,600 - $156,600 (SO and Courts)
*Plus Cane Beds Road access and paving
`County 11 requires phone/fax and Internet DSL; Court IT requires phone/fax and point-to-point T1 service to the Arizona AOC
Mohave County Public Works Department, Engineering Division
MEMORANDUM
Submitted To: Monte L. Wilson, P.E. Engineering Manager
Steven P. Latoski, P.E. P.T.Ci.E. Director
Regarding: Proposed Centennial Park Area County Facility Water Supply
Feasibility and Cost Estimate
Prepared By: Cullin D. Pattilto, F.I.T., Civil Engincer-Unregistert?
r s,.l
• z
Reviewed and Approved 13y: Monte L. Wilson; P.E. Engineering Manager Constractid
Date: Tuesday, June 09, 2009
The Mohave County Public Works Depar mont'Enginecring Division was asked to investigate the
feasibility of providing water service to a proposed Mohave County Facility directlyto the wit and a0ros.9
I°lighway 389 from the Centennial Park (improvement District Water Storage Tank located at an unknown
address along State Route 389 (389) on Mohave County Assessor's Parcel lumber 4134»1.9-063
approximately 2.3 miles from where 389 crosses Short Creek, at Colorado City, Arizona. There are two
options for water service for the proposed County Facility_
1_ Service from Centennial Park Water Intpro enient District
2. The drilling of a well
Regardless of which alternative is selected, due to waterquality issues in the area, apoint ofuse-?(T'C?U)
water tneatmem system with a water softener will be needed in order to treat dissolved solids, hardness,
iron; manganese, sulfates, and radio nuclides naturally` occurring in the areas ground water. Below is a
comparison of probable costs for each alternative with a detailed discussion and cost breakdown on the
following pages.
*Cost Range DepcMunt on Well Deptli,'rhle L'stimateor Probable Cost assumes a production well or
about 100 GPM at a depth of 300 to 400 feet
'• Dependant on Centennial. Paris Improvement DWriet obtaining approval for their proposed point of
Use (POV) trialment tgulpatent and 100 year assured water supply which will detcrmiae strviee
availability
In order to arrive at an opinion ofthe feasibility of providing potable safe drinking and utility water to a
County owned facility, water quality reports from the Centennial Park Improvement District wells were
obtained from the Arizona DepartmetitofF.nvironsnental Quality Northern Pegional Office (ADEQ). It is
assumed„ date to proximity, that the Centennial Park Improvement District will supply wwrto the facility
or similar water quality issues will be encountered should Mohave County determine that it is in the
TOTAL PROBABLE COSTS FOR TWO ALTERNATIVES
(CENTENNIAL SERVICE WITH POU TREATMENT AND
"ti' ELL I}RILLING WITH PUU'IREATMENT)
County's best interest to drib their own well to supply the proposed facility. Below is a summary of the
results contained in the water quality reports from ADEO followed by a discussion and interpretation of
said results as well a breakdown of probable costs for water treatment and two alternative supply scenarios.
2 NA 6/1998 11.5 NA NA 600 NA NA NA NA ILIA
3 120 6/1998 14-19 87 1136 320 7A NA 330 2.1 .28
4 120 6/2006 14 9.7 920 320 7.9 643 292 NA NA
5 104 6/2005 1S 15 1890 999 7,5 1030 1`07 NA .48
6 130 6,02006 12 7.3 1910 18 7.4 1020 247 NA NA
PRIMARY MCi. 15 S -- -- -- -- -- -- --
'Gt:t NIJAKY W -L - - DUU Z3U' D.l-tt.a U..f vm:?
Bowen Collins and Aswiates, Tech??teal 4ten?orandunt?jty? j??g[# Ceutrnuiat t'ark Water Improvement Distriet Point of 1st (POUT)
Radium Treatment tvaluat on, Februar} 21W7 Nagy 3 of tit "Table I (;cnienniai Water 01suirt tNlvttngWe11 **Ynter'OnatiW'
ras- ritat DfssoiwdrSattds
Fe-- trap
Afn -Atang"ere
I _ GPV Gona m Pet slinwe
2-pCK Pleo 0irles.Pxr later
3 -- P'rfmary AICd. Prinwrp Ufa r# errhi cnsiiiaeitrurmt fin* allowed- ip^rfmary VCLs sere l eafth Awed kwis and are m mdatar
4-Smondvry JtC s are set to nwiautA br ew*e !•c water quality f{taste, caalarr, corrosion ejft ur efe-)
In brief, the potential radioactive contaminants in the groundwater are of primary coneern. Radium
226MS is carcinogenic and emits alpha and Beta particles as well as producing.radon gas. The Centennial
Park water wells and presumable any ivell drilled in the area by Mohave County would have to take into
account the need to eliminate this radioactive isotope to at or below the 15 pCi/L level for Alpha Particles
and 5 pCi.J, level for Beta Panicles. In addition to radio nuclide treatment, TDS (due to taste and potential
minor health effects), sulfates (due to minor health effects it( levels ;thrive 500 tang/L). Hardness (due to it's
alkatine taste), fron (due toeflects on plwnbing fixtures) and Ivlangancse (due to effects on phunbing
fixtures) will all need to be treated..
The equipment needed to accomplish this is two fold. First, the Centennial Park Improvement District has
contracted With Alliwice Engineering from St. George Utah to apply for approval to utilize Point of Use
(POIF) treatment system to provide potable drinking water to the residents of Centennial Park. Current
Estimates put the cost of their proposed device, manufactured by Premier Watts of Phoenix Arizona, at
approximately $4,000,00 per unit which produces enough drinking water for 10 people.
This combination device consist ofa filtration system most likely utilizing; activated carbr,n as well as a
reverse osmosis filtering, system in series to treat radionuclides and other water quality issues. In
conjunction with the filtering device, a crater softener mast also be used to address hardness at a potential
cost of S2000,00 per unit depending on desired flow rate.
Water quality concerns aside, if Centennial Improveminit District is utilized for water service, State Route
389 will need to be bored to provide installation of h service.line. An estimate for this is a borehole costing
approximately $100.00 per foot for a distance of approximately 100 feet results in a probable bore cost of
5;10,000.00.
1f Mohave County decides it is in the County's best interest to drill a well for water supply an additional
cost will be incurred.. Current estimates put the probable cost for well drilling at $50.00 per foot for a well
six inches in diameter at a depth of 300 to 400 feet. Existing wells in the Centennial Park Improvement
District range from 300 to 320 feet: and have an estimated production capacity of 100 gallons per minutes.
The over all cost associated with drilling a well would equate to approximately $15,000.00 to $20,000.00
for a six inch diameter 300 •400 foot deep well.
Additionally 55000:00 should be budgeted for a well pump and ancillary controls, $25.00 per foot for
additional pipe-estimating the length needed at Zoo feet which equates to $5,000.00. A hookup for and
emergency chlorinator will need to be installed as well as a chlorinator at a probable cost of $1,000.00
btt d on recent costs associated with the Lake Juniper Project. Finally, security fencing with anti-climb
wire for the well and equipment will be needed for well security. It sestin-tated that a 100 square foot area
will need to be fenced oil: At 540.00 per foot, the probable cost for the fencing would be $1,600.00 for 40
feet of fencing (a 10 loot by 10 foot rectangular area).
On the fallowing pages are tables summarizing the costs for each individual element discussed in this
memorandum as well as the combined totals for two supply alternatives. A total cost comparison is
presented in the first table on the first page of this memorandum,
Table I summarizes the cost for treatment which is needed' regardless of whether Mohave County drills a
well or not. "Cable 2 is a summary of costsassociated with well installation; Table 3, potential highway
389 bore costs.
PROBABL T'REAIMVNT OUST SUN'lMARY - T'ANL F;1
.Water Well (--100 300 - 400 550.00 Per 515,00£ m
GPM Production) Feet Foot 52010000
Pump L:oatrols Lump
and Pressure Tank
Stem $5,000.00 S5,000.
Emergency
Chlorinator Port S p 51000.00 S1,0t UO
and Chlorinator
Fencing
TOTAL S'22,600.00
$27,600:00
"Assumes 25 GFD Consumption Pet Emptoyce
PROBABLE WELL COST SUMMARY -? TABLE'.
)PROBABLE BORING COST SI NIVLARY (HWY 389 BOCCE)
IF WATER SERVICE IS FEtt)M CEO 1TrNNJAL PARK WATER
IMPROVEMENT`DISTRICT'- TABLE 3
Page 1 of 2
Barbara Bracken - Re: Mike Black's Property
~- m.~.... ,~ ~ T. ~n
From: John Gall <johnrgall@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hendrix <Mike.Hendrix@co.mohave.az.us>
Date: 7/2/2009 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Mike Black's Property
CC: Ron Walker <Ron.Walker@co.mohave.az.us>, Gary Watson
<pete.byers@co.mohave.az.us>, <mtb8321@aol.com>, <annieblackl@rocketmail.com>
Good Morning Mike,
I met with Mr. Black late yesterday and he is agreeable to offering 7.5 acres of parcel 402-17-063. He
may be willing to donate the additional 2.5 acres, if after the site review, you deem it necessary.
This parcel is closer to Hwy 1> and is closer to a public utility service area that Mr. Black has a
controlling interest in. So water will be available, but a septic tank would be needed until the waste
water treatment plant is completed.
He is working on his letter of intent, but with the upcoming holiday schedule, most likely won't have it
completed until the end of next week. We would like to be on the BOS agenda for the July 20th, so we
both can attend and inform the concerned community members of the date and allow them an
opportunity to travel to Kingman to let their voices be heard.
I will be in Kingman on Wednesday of next week to meet with you, to discuss the final details of the
donation.
Please feel free to contact me in the interim to discuss, if needed.
Sincerely,
John R Gall
Arizona Land Quest LLC
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Mike Hendrix <Mike.Hendrix,@co.mohave.az.us> wrote:
John,
Just checking on the letter of offer.
Thanks,
Mike
Michael P. Hendrix, P.E.
Deputy County Manager
Public Works & Development Services
E-Mail: mike.hendrix~aco.mohave_a_z.us..
Phone (928) 757-0910 Fax (928) 757-0921
f'~ ~ ACCREC-ITEd
( -°y. m, AGENCY
9. ':4
file://C:\Documents and Settings\Brackb\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4A4CB317Moha... 7/6/2009